| Summary: | 博士 === 淡江大學 === 中國文學系博士班 === 100 === 《MingRuXueAn》( 1676) is completed to let all have known the Neo-Confucianism in Ming Dynasty. However Huang ZongXi viewpoint influence have arrived afterwards the opinion of scholar. Allow scholars from the perspective of Huang Zong-XI''s understanding of Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucianism. However such explanation is the fact that Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucianism can think deeply again.
《ShengXueZongZhuan》(1605) and 《LiXueZongZhuan》(1666) is completed before 《MingRuXueAn》. These two books can be used as a scholar of the Ming dynasty general finishing development of Neo-Confucianism in Ming dynasty. And Huang zongxi also because two people who do not like, so for different academic understanding of the Ming dynasty Neo-Confucianism. Hope to be able to reflect the view of scholar for Ming dynasty Neo-Confucianism through the comparison of this two books.
《ShengXueZongZhuan》 and 《LiXueZongZhuan》 wants to clarification on the academic development of interest to authors. Two books contain a strong Confucian Orthodoxy, and wants to promote Confucius''s Confucian thought, and also to discuss the focus of Neo-Confucianism. 《ShengXueZongZhuan》is Neo-Confucian School of Mind mainly, main memory is of the view that Confucianism by Wang Yangming on Lu Jiuyuan, follow Moral sequence, and also into Buddhism to Confucianism. Zhou Rudeng believes that the Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucianism dominated mainly by Wang Yangming and his disciples, this is authentic. Think "Honoring the Virtuous Nature" and "Following the Knowledge"are very important, to Wang Yangming on the Zhu Xi as the choroid, the rejection of Buddhism, emphasizing the pure nature of Confucianism. Sun Qifeng believes that students of Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming and Wang Yangming''s students are very important in the Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucianism.
Authors want to know are two books under the different ideas, at the same time the different opinions, the agent, how it affects their academic history establishment. Two books for the different understanding of Neo-Confucianism in Ming dynasty, is what we want to know. Therefore, illustrate the two authors of the book how to show their neo-historical, that is the focus of this paper.
|
|---|
