A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan

碩士 === 國立臺北藝術大學 === 建築與文化資產研究所 === 100 === The second amendment of the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law was made in 2005, which brings fresh ideas and broadens the scope of the cultural heritage conservation, especially to the Indigenous cultural heritage. The research would focus on the antiquiti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui-Ting Wu, 吳慧婷
Other Authors: 林會承
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39q3f5
id ndltd-TW-100TNUA0733001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-100TNUA07330012018-04-10T17:21:31Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39q3f5 A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan 原住民古物保存機制的研究 Hui-Ting Wu 吳慧婷 碩士 國立臺北藝術大學 建築與文化資產研究所 100 The second amendment of the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law was made in 2005, which brings fresh ideas and broadens the scope of the cultural heritage conservation, especially to the Indigenous cultural heritage. The research would focus on the antiquities of the Indigenous in Taiwan. Only forty-three out of more than four hundred antiquities was appointed and included since 2005. The research analyzes the factors which influence the conservation from the property of the Indigenous antiquities and the content and practice of the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law. The author takes the forty-three Indigenous antiquities in the inclusion list for example to examine the evaluation and practice of the appointment and inclusion of the Indigenous antiquities. In addition, the author analyses and discusses the following work and the contemporary conservation of the “ carved house post with ancestral motif of Taromak Style ”, “ carved central post of Zingrur’s house of Kapian Tribe of Paiwan group ” and “ Amis carved pillar of Kakitaan ancestor house of Tafalong Tribe ” in order to find out the reasons why the inclusion of Indigenous antiquities was ineffective. The conclusion can be divided into four points: 1.The factors which affected the inclusion of the Indigenous antiquities could be traced from the cultural heritage conservation during the Japanese Rule. 2.The conservation could only start and the reasons why the inclusion was ineffective could be discovered until the uniqueness of the Indigenous antiquities was understood. 3.It is not the law but the people who report and practice the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law influence the inclusion of the Indigenous antiquities. 4.The combination of the “material” and “people” assigns cultural meaning and value to the conservation of Indigenous antiquities. 林會承 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 172 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北藝術大學 === 建築與文化資產研究所 === 100 === The second amendment of the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law was made in 2005, which brings fresh ideas and broadens the scope of the cultural heritage conservation, especially to the Indigenous cultural heritage. The research would focus on the antiquities of the Indigenous in Taiwan. Only forty-three out of more than four hundred antiquities was appointed and included since 2005. The research analyzes the factors which influence the conservation from the property of the Indigenous antiquities and the content and practice of the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law. The author takes the forty-three Indigenous antiquities in the inclusion list for example to examine the evaluation and practice of the appointment and inclusion of the Indigenous antiquities. In addition, the author analyses and discusses the following work and the contemporary conservation of the “ carved house post with ancestral motif of Taromak Style ”, “ carved central post of Zingrur’s house of Kapian Tribe of Paiwan group ” and “ Amis carved pillar of Kakitaan ancestor house of Tafalong Tribe ” in order to find out the reasons why the inclusion of Indigenous antiquities was ineffective. The conclusion can be divided into four points: 1.The factors which affected the inclusion of the Indigenous antiquities could be traced from the cultural heritage conservation during the Japanese Rule. 2.The conservation could only start and the reasons why the inclusion was ineffective could be discovered until the uniqueness of the Indigenous antiquities was understood. 3.It is not the law but the people who report and practice the Cultural Heritage Conservation Law influence the inclusion of the Indigenous antiquities. 4.The combination of the “material” and “people” assigns cultural meaning and value to the conservation of Indigenous antiquities.
author2 林會承
author_facet 林會承
Hui-Ting Wu
吳慧婷
author Hui-Ting Wu
吳慧婷
spellingShingle Hui-Ting Wu
吳慧婷
A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan
author_sort Hui-Ting Wu
title A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan
title_short A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan
title_full A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan
title_fullStr A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed A Study on the Conservation Mechanism of Antiquities of the Indigenous People of Taiwan
title_sort study on the conservation mechanism of antiquities of the indigenous people of taiwan
publishDate 2012
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39q3f5
work_keys_str_mv AT huitingwu astudyontheconservationmechanismofantiquitiesoftheindigenouspeopleoftaiwan
AT wúhuìtíng astudyontheconservationmechanismofantiquitiesoftheindigenouspeopleoftaiwan
AT huitingwu yuánzhùmíngǔwùbǎocúnjīzhìdeyánjiū
AT wúhuìtíng yuánzhùmíngǔwùbǎocúnjīzhìdeyánjiū
AT huitingwu studyontheconservationmechanismofantiquitiesoftheindigenouspeopleoftaiwan
AT wúhuìtíng studyontheconservationmechanismofantiquitiesoftheindigenouspeopleoftaiwan
_version_ 1718626430618697728