| Summary: | 碩士 === 健行科技大學 === 經營管理研究所 === 101 === The main aim of this study was to investigate the student satisfaction towards school lunch programs, for Grade 5 and 6 students and school staff, in elementary schools.
The data collection was achieved mainly via questionnaires. It took public elementary schools in Taoyuan County, which have school lunch programs, as the population. In addition, Stratified Random Sampling approach was used when sending out the questionnaires. 504 copies of questionnaire were sent out. 483 copies were returned, which led to a retrieval ratios of 98.83%. Furthermore, this study used the statistical software SPSS12.0 for Windows and statistical methods, such as t-Test, One-way ANOVA, Scheffe’s Post hoc Comparison, frequency distribution and percentage to carry out the data analysis for the acquired data. Thus, according to data analysis, the results and finding were as follows:
1. Grade 5 and 6 students and school staff of elementary schools were generally satisfied at the school-provided lunch management.
2. Grade 5 and 6 students’ satisfaction at the school lunch management will be Significant for: “methods of payment”, “frequency of meals”, “ frequency of access”, “lunch price”, “ frequency of fruits”, “frequency of milk”, “lunchbox providers”, “complaint mechanism”, “problem management”, “nutrition education”, “food nationality origin”, “hygiene education”, “eating environment”.
3. Grade 5 and 6 student satisfaction at the school lunch management will not be significant for: “online menu manager’, “leftover management”, “food dishes”, “frequency of vegetable education”, “hygiene educator”.
4. Grade 5 and 6 student satisfaction at the school lunch management will be significant for “ duration of school lunch secretary position”, “other position occupied by school lunch secretary”.
Therefore, according to the aforementioned results and findings. This study proposes some recommendations for education administrative authorities, related school administrative personnel, undertakers of the school lunch programs, suppliers of school lunches, and related follow-up researchers.
|
|---|
