Analysis and Exploration of Interior Design Agreement

碩士 === 健行科技大學 === 空間資訊與防災研究所 === 101 === With the demand to improve the quality of life, the requirements for residential and commercial space interior designs are accordingly increased. However, disputes over interior designs have also been increasing. In order to avoid interior design disputes, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shin-Rung Lin, 林欣蓉
Other Authors: 吳昭慧
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2013
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/63532526379576881714
Description
Summary:碩士 === 健行科技大學 === 空間資訊與防災研究所 === 101 === With the demand to improve the quality of life, the requirements for residential and commercial space interior designs are accordingly increased. However, disputes over interior designs have also been increasing. In order to avoid interior design disputes, the Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior published “Interior Design of Building - Sample Design Commission Agreement” and “Interior Design of Building-Sample Construction Project Agreement” in June, 2012 for the decoration industry to refer to. However, the effect still needs to be observed. The methods of literature review and induction are utilized in this study. Usual disputes involved in interior design agreements are reviewed and induced, and the current related legal regulations and the result of the induction of the disputes are analyzed and explored. Furthermore, the samples of interior design agreements and interior construction agreements used in the industry are collected. Three agreements are selected from these two types of agreements respectively. The terms and conditions in the same type of agreement are analyzed and compared to find out if the level of detail and if the contents of the agreement can solve the disputes. Finally, the contents of the agreements are analyzed and related suggestions are put forward. According to the results of analysis and comparison, there are 15 items which has not been regulated in the “Interior Design of Building- Sample Design Commission Agreement”, and 11 items not regulated in the “Interior Design of Building- Sample Construction Project Agreement”. For the unregulated items by the Ministry of Interior or regulated items with insufficient details, perhaps it is because that the Ministry of Interior had considered them when determine the terms and conditions of the sample agreements, but they didn’t list them in the agreements due to the difficulties of implementation. It is expected that the results of this study can be used as a reference for the related competent authorities and interior design and construction companies to reduce disputes in the future.