Exploring a Performance Assessment Model for the Non-formal Education Institute by Hybrid MCDM Approach

碩士 === 開南大學 === 專案管理研究所 === 101 === For the purpose of reaching enterprise strategic objectives, project manager lead the project team to implement the project. Project manager must have the leadership skills to establish an effective project team, to complete the project successfully, and thus to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Chun Liu, 劉玉淳
Other Authors: Meng-Jong Kuan
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2013
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/36337507424204863083
Description
Summary:碩士 === 開南大學 === 專案管理研究所 === 101 === For the purpose of reaching enterprise strategic objectives, project manager lead the project team to implement the project. Project manager must have the leadership skills to establish an effective project team, to complete the project successfully, and thus to achieve enterprise strategic objectives. The leadership skills are the leading synergy from the seven qualities of leadership. So that project managers must continuously build their own capability of seven leadership qualities through self-evaluation process. In this study, we also create the framework of learning performance of Non-formal education, and there are three dimensions and eleven criteria. After creating the framework for leadership assessment and learning performance of Non-formal education, this research apply DEMATEL method and DEMATEL-Based ANP of the Hybrid MCDM to find out the influence relation and influence weight of the leadership performance assessment model and performance assessment model for the Non-formal education institute. Finally, this research applies VIKOR method to assess the performance of leadership and the performance of the Non-formal education institute. In the empirical analysis show the outcomes that the dimension ‘‘Thinking Ability’’ is the most influential dimension in leadership assessment model, and viability is the most influenced dimension. Otherwise, the dimension of “Work Environment factors” is the most influential dimension , and “Training Curriculum Implementation Factors” is the most influenced dimension.