| Summary: | 碩士 === 慈濟大學 === 教育研究所 === 101 === The purposes of this study are threefold: 1 to analyze the differences of
coaching leadership behavior as perceived by basketball players with different
demographic variables; 2. to analyze the differences of team cohesion as
perceived by basketball players with different demographic variables; 3. to
investigate how the coaching leadership behavior can predict the team cohesion
as perceived by the basketball players.
Fourteen basketball teams of Hualian County joining the 101 School Year
Junior High School Basketball League are recruited as the research participants.
Two hundred and nine valid surveys are collected and statistically analyzed by
t-test, one-way ANOVA, one-way MANOVA, and stepwise multiple regression.
The results indicated that there are different coaching leadership behavior
and team cohesion as perceived by basketball players with different demographic
variables, and that the coaching leadership behavior is high predictive of the team
cohesion.
As for coaching leadership behavior, female players perceived more
instructional and training behavior, praising behavior, social support behavior,
and communicative behavior than the male counterparts. The 7th graders
perceived more instructional and training behavior, social support behavior, and
more managing behavior than the 9th graders. Those who have been trained less
than 1 year perceived more instructional and training behavior than those who
have been trained for 2 to 3 years. There are different coaching leadership
III
behavior as perceived by those players with different weekly training amount .
Last, the top 3 teams who won the national competition perceived more coaching
leadership behavior than those top 3 teams who won the local county
competition.
As for team cohesion, female players perceived more teamwork,
interpersonal affiliation, and team adaptation than the male ones. The 9th graders
perceived more teamwork and interpersonal affiliation than the 7th graders.
There are different team cohesion as perceived by those players with different
weekly training amount.
Lastly, recommendations for school administration, basketball coaching,
and following research are proposed based on the literature review and the
research findings of this study.
|
|---|
