Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班 === 101 === This study focuses on defining organizational positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee in Taipei City Government by using the way of qualitative research method, interviewing present Chairman of the Aboriginal Peoples Committee, two former Chairman of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fang-Ru Lee, 李芳儒
Other Authors: 黃一峯
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2013
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/32362078611130272869
id ndltd-TW-101TKU05055057
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-101TKU050550572016-02-21T04:20:15Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/32362078611130272869 Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government 原住民族行政機關定位之研究:以臺北市政府原住民族事務委員會為例 Fang-Ru Lee 李芳儒 碩士 淡江大學 公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班 101 This study focuses on defining organizational positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee in Taipei City Government by using the way of qualitative research method, interviewing present Chairman of the Aboriginal Peoples Committee, two former Chairman of the Aboriginal Peoples Committee and one former Taipei City Councilor who had been held a post for 16 years in order to obtaining their opinion base on their precious experiences. This study first used the theory of Representative bureaucracy and the theory of The Ethnic-based Representative Agency in discussing whether or not the Aboriginal People Committee needs to restructure its organization or reconsider its position and values in Taipei City Government. This study indicates establishment of Aboriginal Peoples Committee has a really important meaning for Aboriginal people in modern history, if the Aboriginal Peoples Committee has not been established in March 1994, there would not have pressure on Central Government for organizing Aboriginal Peoples Committee in Central Government in December and following Aboriginal Peoples Committee had been established in other cities in Taiwan as well. Interviewing results of this study indicate three conclusions. First, the Aboriginal People Committee needs to reconsider defining its positioning from old days base onthe expectation of aboriginal people in nowadays. Second, in this stage, the aboriginal People Committee is still a follower and it needs to take charge managing all the social protection systems and social welfare systems for aboriginal people in Taipei City in order to highlight the uniqueness and specificities of aboriginal people. Third, it needs to be aggressive by providing or revising suitable statutory provisions to support its administrative work and define the role and positioning of Aboriginal People Committee in Taipei City Government. 黃一峯 2013 學位論文 ; thesis 169 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班 === 101 === This study focuses on defining organizational positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee in Taipei City Government by using the way of qualitative research method, interviewing present Chairman of the Aboriginal Peoples Committee, two former Chairman of the Aboriginal Peoples Committee and one former Taipei City Councilor who had been held a post for 16 years in order to obtaining their opinion base on their precious experiences. This study first used the theory of Representative bureaucracy and the theory of The Ethnic-based Representative Agency in discussing whether or not the Aboriginal People Committee needs to restructure its organization or reconsider its position and values in Taipei City Government. This study indicates establishment of Aboriginal Peoples Committee has a really important meaning for Aboriginal people in modern history, if the Aboriginal Peoples Committee has not been established in March 1994, there would not have pressure on Central Government for organizing Aboriginal Peoples Committee in Central Government in December and following Aboriginal Peoples Committee had been established in other cities in Taiwan as well. Interviewing results of this study indicate three conclusions. First, the Aboriginal People Committee needs to reconsider defining its positioning from old days base onthe expectation of aboriginal people in nowadays. Second, in this stage, the aboriginal People Committee is still a follower and it needs to take charge managing all the social protection systems and social welfare systems for aboriginal people in Taipei City in order to highlight the uniqueness and specificities of aboriginal people. Third, it needs to be aggressive by providing or revising suitable statutory provisions to support its administrative work and define the role and positioning of Aboriginal People Committee in Taipei City Government.
author2 黃一峯
author_facet 黃一峯
Fang-Ru Lee
李芳儒
author Fang-Ru Lee
李芳儒
spellingShingle Fang-Ru Lee
李芳儒
Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government
author_sort Fang-Ru Lee
title Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government
title_short Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government
title_full Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government
title_fullStr Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government
title_full_unstemmed Organizational Positioning of Aboriginal Peoples Committee,Taipei City Government
title_sort organizational positioning of aboriginal peoples committee,taipei city government
publishDate 2013
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/32362078611130272869
work_keys_str_mv AT fangrulee organizationalpositioningofaboriginalpeoplescommitteetaipeicitygovernment
AT lǐfāngrú organizationalpositioningofaboriginalpeoplescommitteetaipeicitygovernment
AT fangrulee yuánzhùmínzúxíngzhèngjīguāndìngwèizhīyánjiūyǐtáiběishìzhèngfǔyuánzhùmínzúshìwùwěiyuánhuìwèilì
AT lǐfāngrú yuánzhùmínzúxíngzhèngjīguāndìngwèizhīyánjiūyǐtáiběishìzhèngfǔyuánzhùmínzúshìwùwěiyuánhuìwèilì
_version_ 1718192888892882944