Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches

碩士 === 元智大學 === 工業工程與管理學系 === 101 === This thesis aims to investigate the discrepancy between decision making based on deterministic approach and fuzzy approach. Two selection problems are examined; one is selecting USB cables supplier, and the other is selecting a location in a campus that will g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tzu-Jung Chen, 陳姿蓉
Other Authors: Chiuh-Cheng Chyu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02911063519014871953
id ndltd-TW-101YZU05031051
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-101YZU050310512015-10-13T22:40:49Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02911063519014871953 Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches 確定性與模糊性多準則模式於決策問題差異性之個案探討分析 Tzu-Jung Chen 陳姿蓉 碩士 元智大學 工業工程與管理學系 101 This thesis aims to investigate the discrepancy between decision making based on deterministic approach and fuzzy approach. Two selection problems are examined; one is selecting USB cables supplier, and the other is selecting a location in a campus that will generate most business benefit of a fashion and intelligent vending machine. For the first supplier section problem, an example and data set is taken from Chou and Chang (2008). In the method, Fuzzy SMART was applied to aggregate experts’ opinions and to calculate each attribute weight. Then three alternatives are compared using SMART and TOPSIS methods in both crisp and fuzzy modes. We found that the ranking of these alternatives are the same since the five experts’ evaluations on many aspects do not deviate much. The second study focus on a location selection problem of placing a fashion and intelligent vending machine at a college campus in north Taiwan. Four steps are taken to reach a conclusion: (1) Employ brainstorm method to establish an initial hierarchical decision criteria structure, as well as five alternative locations; (2) apply two-dimensional fuzzy Kano’s model to integrate experts’ opinion and eliminate attributes of lower importance; (3) use fuzzy SMART to aggregate the experts’ evaluations and compute the weight of each attribute, (4) rank the five alternatives using crisp/fuzzy SMART and TOPSIS. The numerical results indicate that the four methods produce the same ranking for the five alternatives, and the score differences are significant between any two consecutive ranking alternatives. Chiuh-Cheng Chyu 徐旭昇 學位論文 ; thesis 87 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 元智大學 === 工業工程與管理學系 === 101 === This thesis aims to investigate the discrepancy between decision making based on deterministic approach and fuzzy approach. Two selection problems are examined; one is selecting USB cables supplier, and the other is selecting a location in a campus that will generate most business benefit of a fashion and intelligent vending machine. For the first supplier section problem, an example and data set is taken from Chou and Chang (2008). In the method, Fuzzy SMART was applied to aggregate experts’ opinions and to calculate each attribute weight. Then three alternatives are compared using SMART and TOPSIS methods in both crisp and fuzzy modes. We found that the ranking of these alternatives are the same since the five experts’ evaluations on many aspects do not deviate much. The second study focus on a location selection problem of placing a fashion and intelligent vending machine at a college campus in north Taiwan. Four steps are taken to reach a conclusion: (1) Employ brainstorm method to establish an initial hierarchical decision criteria structure, as well as five alternative locations; (2) apply two-dimensional fuzzy Kano’s model to integrate experts’ opinion and eliminate attributes of lower importance; (3) use fuzzy SMART to aggregate the experts’ evaluations and compute the weight of each attribute, (4) rank the five alternatives using crisp/fuzzy SMART and TOPSIS. The numerical results indicate that the four methods produce the same ranking for the five alternatives, and the score differences are significant between any two consecutive ranking alternatives.
author2 Chiuh-Cheng Chyu
author_facet Chiuh-Cheng Chyu
Tzu-Jung Chen
陳姿蓉
author Tzu-Jung Chen
陳姿蓉
spellingShingle Tzu-Jung Chen
陳姿蓉
Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches
author_sort Tzu-Jung Chen
title Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches
title_short Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches
title_full Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches
title_fullStr Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Case Studies on the Discrepancy of Multi-Criterion Decision Making between Deterministic and Fuzzy Approaches
title_sort case studies on the discrepancy of multi-criterion decision making between deterministic and fuzzy approaches
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02911063519014871953
work_keys_str_mv AT tzujungchen casestudiesonthediscrepancyofmulticriteriondecisionmakingbetweendeterministicandfuzzyapproaches
AT chénzīróng casestudiesonthediscrepancyofmulticriteriondecisionmakingbetweendeterministicandfuzzyapproaches
AT tzujungchen quèdìngxìngyǔmóhúxìngduōzhǔnzémóshìyújuécèwèntíchàyìxìngzhīgèàntàntǎofēnxī
AT chénzīróng quèdìngxìngyǔmóhúxìngduōzhǔnzémóshìyújuécèwèntíchàyìxìngzhīgèàntàntǎofēnxī
_version_ 1718080349046571008