Exploring the differences and influential factors on fraud crimes sentencing practices: Taking Article 339 (1) of Criminal Code as an Example
博士 === 中央警察大學 === 犯罪防治研究所 === 102 === The purpose of this dissertation includes four goals: 1.Applying a comparative perspective, this study collects criminal fraud cases which were sentenced in U.K., U.S., and Hong Kong in order to conduct literature analysis for identifying what kinds of “weighted...
Main Authors: | Chen, Hsin-liang, 陳信良 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | 林東茂、陳玉書 |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
1030
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/zbvwmy |
Similar Items
-
The Research Of False Property Crime-Focusing On The Criminal Law Articles 339 Offense Of Fraudulent
by: Chen, Ju-Ting, et al.
Published: (2018) -
A Study of Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting:Taking the investigations of emerging fraud crime by Criminal Investigation Bureau as an example
by: HU,JEN-HAO, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Essays on the economics of crime and criminal sentencing
by: McConnell, B. I.
Published: (2015) -
Criminal Policy and the Practical Process of Sentencing~Taking Larceny as an Example~
by: Yen-Liang Lin, et al.
Published: (2008) -
To the Issue of the Object of Crime Provided for by Article 244 of the Russian Criminal Code
by: Pestereva Yu. S., et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)