The research on the cross strait cooperation for combatting cross border fraudulent crimes.

• Main Authors: Ching Pai Wu, 吳清白
• Other Authors: 仉桂美
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2013
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/54046322347741488781

碩士 === 開南大學 === 人文社會學院公共管理碩士在職專班 === 102 === Abstract Due to the influence of developing technology and globalization, the act of crime does not limit itself in one single country these days. Furthermore, the forms and sophistications of crime have varied with the ever changing environment in the field of finance, internet and telecommunication. The committing of crime is now cross bordered and has evolved itself into professional, organizational and multidimensional. It is now the vast concern for many countries and Taiwan is no exception. This research thus intends to analyze the current situation and tries to reveal the elements that decide the cross strait co-operations in fighting against fraud between Taiwan and China. All in all, the research aims to come up with methods and strategies for the reference of law departments in cracking down cross border fraud. This research considers that the evolution of cross border crime of fraud and the institution of cross strait co-operation on crime together decide－﹥contribute to the formation of current policy in fighting against fraud. Since policy is the key element to its end result, the modification of existing policy and co-operation should be based upon its execution. In order to analyze the background and the mechanism of co-operation and follow the modification of cooperating strategy, this research conducts in-depth questionnaires and interviews with 12 police officers that－﹥who actually worked in the field of cross strait co-operation in fighting against fraud. With the method of qualitative interviews, this research is then able to investigate the current situation and testify its hypothesis. Based on the concepts of mutual aid regarding global governance and justice, this research brings up four agendas to examine. First of all, cross border crime of fraud should be examined on a global basis. Second, the co-operation in fighting against cross border crime of fraud still leaves a lot of room to improve. Third, the difference of investigation between Taiwan and China requires further communication and coordination. Finally, the mechanism of co-operation in fighting against fraud needs further upgrade. We therefore propose 6 suggestions for the current institutions to consider: 1.Broaden the inter-communications of police, nail down the difference of investigations to improve mutual understanding and trust.2.Reinforce educational trainings and discussions on criminal acts.3.Enrich the subjects of co-operations and develop channels of communication.4.Set up specific institutions to reward or punish the co-operation, which should then motivate the investigation of cross border fraud.5.Develop and share database of criminals and use it as a platform for investigation.6.Assign exclusive institutions and police officers to be in charge of mutual co-operation so that the investigations can be more effective. Keywords: fraud, globalization, cross border crime, global governance, mutual judicial aid, cross border governance.