The Emerging of Art Community and It’s Impacts - A Case Study of Treasure Hill.

• Main Authors: Lin Ke-Fen, 林克玢
• Other Authors: 廖仁義
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2014
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47998416328394720530

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 表演藝術研究所 === 102 === The Ministry of Culture first raised the concept of “community empowerment” in 1994. In 2008, government implemented “the Taiwan Life Aesthetics Campaign Program" which was the first time the phrase” Art intervention” formally used in a government policy. Treasure Hill was an illegal self-build residence area in the past. It has been a tough time transferring from an illegal but naturally-formed settlement to the arts-residents-paragenesis settlement today. Originally, this study tended to understand the Treasure Hill through the views of art intervening into community and community empowerment; trying to learn the current situations of space-repurposing and the relationship which associate by human emotions and memories. It turned out to find that the Treasure Hill settlement doesn’t have the conditions for community empowerment. The consequences which this study finds through the literature review and interviews are: “Art is the media of community empowerment and culture preservation”, “The development strategy of the Treasure Hill as an art village just hit the expectation of government wished for cultural tourism”, “The most important assets of the Treasure Hill would be the preservation for culture of settlement and the extraordinary composition of spatial texture there”, “Decisions making and practicing must be totally communicated in advance. Inhabitants should have chances to attend the decision making terms,” and “It’s not right about the saying “art for art’s sake”, art is the simple but ethic practice in life.”