| Summary: | 博士 === 國立臺北教育大學 === 教育經營與管理學系 === 102 === This study examines the relationships among the school intellectual capital,the school innovation management and school competitiveness of the elementary and junior high schools, the brand-molding, and the differences of school competitiveness. The research subjects are the principals, directors, low leader and teachers of th Yilan County junior high and elementary schools. The research results are deducted from the analysis of the findings, the survey of the questionnaires, and the focus group interviews catering to the research purposes and research questions. The analysis results provide suggestions for future researches for the educational administrative institutes, for the junior high and elementary schools , and teachers.
Based on previous researches, a research theoretical scaffolding was built with the focus group analysis technique. The questionnaire of the school intellectual capital,the school innovation management and school competitiveness the elementary and junior high schools, was used to draw random samples of the 1,006 principals, directors, low leader and teachers of the Yilan County. There were 886 effective questionnaires. The dada was analyzed by the Windows SPSS 18.0 statistics analysis software, analyzing the mean value and standard deviations of the view points of the subjects school intellectual capital,the school innovation management and school competitiveness the elementary and junior high schools. Analysis of variance and the Scheffé method were conducted to compare subjects from different school backgrounds and community backgrounds to decide if they have obvious differences upon school competitiveness, school intellectual capital,the school innovation management. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used in analyzing school intellectual capital,the school innovation management and the school competitiveness. With the analyzed data from the questionnaires along with the researches and the information acquired from the interviews, the following conclusions are formed after comprehensive discussions：
1. Schools intellectual capital, innovation management research for school competitive with the times, the value and applicability.
2. Schools intellectual capital, innovation management and development of the school competitive with theoretical support.
3. Master dissertation domestic capital for innovative business school research and competitive intelligence school, are taking a positive conclusion.
4. The elementary and junior high schools intellectual capital, innovative business schools, schools at all levels are competitive and are "moderate performance" level.
5. Performance in terms of male educators school intellectual capital, senior and young teachers, principals, and full-time or subject teachers, new schools and a short history of the school educational personnel, representing a higher level of consciousness of other educational personnel.
6. Higher "principals" than other educational personnel at the school level of perceived innovation management.
7. The degree of intellectual capital, the higher the degree of innovative business schools, their schools more competitive good.
8. "Elementary", "city (towns and villages) Center Area" and "mountainous and remote areas", "relationship capital, the higher the degree of schools'" competitiveness of its high schools.
9. "Educators 'Masters and Ph.D.' qualifications", the lower level of consciousness competitiveness.
10. The higher the degree of intellectual capital schools, their school innovation more favorable operating performance.
11. Young and senior education officers perceived a higher degree of innovative business school, "rural areas" schools, moderate size of the school, the school innovation more favorable operating performance.
12. The elementary and junior high schools intellectual capital of highly positive correlation between the level of competitiveness and schools at all levels.
13. The elementary and junior high schools innovation management of highly positive correlation between the level of competitiveness and schools at all levels.
14. The elementary and junior high schools at all levels of intellectual capital and innovation management schools reached a high positive correlation between the levels.
15. The elementary and junior high schools explanatory power of intellectual capital on highly competitive schools predictive power.
16. The elementary and junior high schools to explain the power of innovative business school is highly competitive predictive power.
17. The elementary and junior high schools to explain the power of intellectual capital is a highly innovative business schools predict.
18. The elementary and junior high schools relational model of intellectual capital, innovation management and competitiveness in school, school innovation management as a mediator.
Another study based on the conclusions put forward concrete proposals to enable the competent educational authority, the national primary and secondary schools, teachers and researchers subsequent reference.
|
|---|
