A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 語言學研究所 === 102 === This study investigates the voice system in Kanakanavu, a Formosan language spoken in southern Taiwan, primarily from three perspectives—morphosyntax, semantic role, and discourse functions. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that Kanakanavu has three indicati...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92812247915987243327 |
id |
ndltd-TW-102NTU05462005 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-102NTU054620052016-03-09T04:24:07Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92812247915987243327 A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu 卡那卡那富語焦點系統之語意及言談功能 Hsing-Chen Liu 劉星辰 碩士 國立臺灣大學 語言學研究所 102 This study investigates the voice system in Kanakanavu, a Formosan language spoken in southern Taiwan, primarily from three perspectives—morphosyntax, semantic role, and discourse functions. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that Kanakanavu has three indicative voice types, namely Agent voice, Patient voice, and Instrumental voice, whereas the assumed locative marker occurs only in nominalized structure. The semantic roles triggered in a clause also vary in accordance with each voice type, with Patient voice capable of carrying the largest number of semantics roles on the nominative argument. On the other hand, the quantitative approach proposed by Giv&;oacute;n (1983, 2001) is adopted in the analyses in order to access the notion of topicality reflected in the use of Kanakanavu voice system. By examining the statistical results retrieved from our corpus, we found that the Agent argument, whether in Actor- or Non-actor voice clauses, exhibits higher topicality, whereas the Patient argument in NAV clauses is only moderately topical and is even less so in AV ones. The discrepancy of the topicality rendered in the arguments implies that the NAV construction does not function as passive, but rather as a transitive clause with two core-like arguments. This result corroborates the feasibility of analyzing two-argument AV clauses in Kanakanavu, as well as in some other Formosan languages, as Extended Intransitive Constructions (Dixon 1984, Huang and Tanangkingsing 2011). We will finally incorporate the above results with regard to voice morphology, semantics and discourse behavior, and attempt to compare with Tsou on a typological scale. Our findings reveal that in the continuum of the pragmatics of Austronesian languages, Kanakanavu may be positioned between Tsou and Seediq (cf. Huang 2002). Li-May Sung 宋麗梅 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 106 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 語言學研究所 === 102 === This study investigates the voice system in Kanakanavu, a Formosan language spoken in southern Taiwan, primarily from three perspectives—morphosyntax, semantic role, and discourse functions. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that Kanakanavu has three indicative voice types, namely Agent voice, Patient voice, and Instrumental voice, whereas the assumed locative marker occurs only in nominalized structure. The semantic roles triggered in a clause also vary in accordance with each voice type, with Patient voice capable of carrying the largest number of semantics roles on the nominative argument. On the other hand, the quantitative approach proposed by Giv&;oacute;n (1983, 2001) is adopted in the analyses in order to access the notion of topicality reflected in the use of Kanakanavu voice system. By examining the statistical results retrieved from our corpus, we found that the Agent argument, whether in Actor- or Non-actor voice clauses, exhibits higher topicality, whereas the Patient argument in NAV clauses is only moderately topical and is even less so in AV ones. The discrepancy of the topicality rendered in the arguments implies that the NAV construction does not function as passive, but rather as a transitive clause with two core-like arguments. This result corroborates the feasibility of analyzing two-argument AV clauses in Kanakanavu, as well as in some other Formosan languages, as Extended Intransitive Constructions (Dixon 1984, Huang and Tanangkingsing 2011). We will finally incorporate the above results with regard to voice morphology, semantics and discourse behavior, and attempt to compare with Tsou on a typological scale. Our findings reveal that in the continuum of the pragmatics of Austronesian languages, Kanakanavu may be positioned between Tsou and Seediq (cf. Huang 2002).
|
author2 |
Li-May Sung |
author_facet |
Li-May Sung Hsing-Chen Liu 劉星辰 |
author |
Hsing-Chen Liu 劉星辰 |
spellingShingle |
Hsing-Chen Liu 劉星辰 A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu |
author_sort |
Hsing-Chen Liu |
title |
A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu |
title_short |
A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu |
title_full |
A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu |
title_fullStr |
A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu |
title_sort |
semantic and discourse study on the voice system in kanakanavu |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92812247915987243327 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hsingchenliu asemanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu AT liúxīngchén asemanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu AT hsingchenliu kǎnàkǎnàfùyǔjiāodiǎnxìtǒngzhīyǔyìjíyántángōngnéng AT liúxīngchén kǎnàkǎnàfùyǔjiāodiǎnxìtǒngzhīyǔyìjíyántángōngnéng AT hsingchenliu semanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu AT liúxīngchén semanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu |
_version_ |
1718200724266942464 |