A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 語言學研究所 === 102 === This study investigates the voice system in Kanakanavu, a Formosan language spoken in southern Taiwan, primarily from three perspectives—morphosyntax, semantic role, and discourse functions. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that Kanakanavu has three indicati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsing-Chen Liu, 劉星辰
Other Authors: Li-May Sung
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92812247915987243327
id ndltd-TW-102NTU05462005
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-102NTU054620052016-03-09T04:24:07Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92812247915987243327 A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu 卡那卡那富語焦點系統之語意及言談功能 Hsing-Chen Liu 劉星辰 碩士 國立臺灣大學 語言學研究所 102 This study investigates the voice system in Kanakanavu, a Formosan language spoken in southern Taiwan, primarily from three perspectives—morphosyntax, semantic role, and discourse functions. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that Kanakanavu has three indicative voice types, namely Agent voice, Patient voice, and Instrumental voice, whereas the assumed locative marker occurs only in nominalized structure. The semantic roles triggered in a clause also vary in accordance with each voice type, with Patient voice capable of carrying the largest number of semantics roles on the nominative argument. On the other hand, the quantitative approach proposed by Giv&;oacute;n (1983, 2001) is adopted in the analyses in order to access the notion of topicality reflected in the use of Kanakanavu voice system. By examining the statistical results retrieved from our corpus, we found that the Agent argument, whether in Actor- or Non-actor voice clauses, exhibits higher topicality, whereas the Patient argument in NAV clauses is only moderately topical and is even less so in AV ones. The discrepancy of the topicality rendered in the arguments implies that the NAV construction does not function as passive, but rather as a transitive clause with two core-like arguments. This result corroborates the feasibility of analyzing two-argument AV clauses in Kanakanavu, as well as in some other Formosan languages, as Extended Intransitive Constructions (Dixon 1984, Huang and Tanangkingsing 2011). We will finally incorporate the above results with regard to voice morphology, semantics and discourse behavior, and attempt to compare with Tsou on a typological scale. Our findings reveal that in the continuum of the pragmatics of Austronesian languages, Kanakanavu may be positioned between Tsou and Seediq (cf. Huang 2002). Li-May Sung 宋麗梅 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 106 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 語言學研究所 === 102 === This study investigates the voice system in Kanakanavu, a Formosan language spoken in southern Taiwan, primarily from three perspectives—morphosyntax, semantic role, and discourse functions. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that Kanakanavu has three indicative voice types, namely Agent voice, Patient voice, and Instrumental voice, whereas the assumed locative marker occurs only in nominalized structure. The semantic roles triggered in a clause also vary in accordance with each voice type, with Patient voice capable of carrying the largest number of semantics roles on the nominative argument. On the other hand, the quantitative approach proposed by Giv&;oacute;n (1983, 2001) is adopted in the analyses in order to access the notion of topicality reflected in the use of Kanakanavu voice system. By examining the statistical results retrieved from our corpus, we found that the Agent argument, whether in Actor- or Non-actor voice clauses, exhibits higher topicality, whereas the Patient argument in NAV clauses is only moderately topical and is even less so in AV ones. The discrepancy of the topicality rendered in the arguments implies that the NAV construction does not function as passive, but rather as a transitive clause with two core-like arguments. This result corroborates the feasibility of analyzing two-argument AV clauses in Kanakanavu, as well as in some other Formosan languages, as Extended Intransitive Constructions (Dixon 1984, Huang and Tanangkingsing 2011). We will finally incorporate the above results with regard to voice morphology, semantics and discourse behavior, and attempt to compare with Tsou on a typological scale. Our findings reveal that in the continuum of the pragmatics of Austronesian languages, Kanakanavu may be positioned between Tsou and Seediq (cf. Huang 2002).
author2 Li-May Sung
author_facet Li-May Sung
Hsing-Chen Liu
劉星辰
author Hsing-Chen Liu
劉星辰
spellingShingle Hsing-Chen Liu
劉星辰
A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
author_sort Hsing-Chen Liu
title A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
title_short A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
title_full A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
title_fullStr A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
title_full_unstemmed A Semantic and Discourse Study on the Voice System in Kanakanavu
title_sort semantic and discourse study on the voice system in kanakanavu
publishDate 2014
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92812247915987243327
work_keys_str_mv AT hsingchenliu asemanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu
AT liúxīngchén asemanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu
AT hsingchenliu kǎnàkǎnàfùyǔjiāodiǎnxìtǒngzhīyǔyìjíyántángōngnéng
AT liúxīngchén kǎnàkǎnàfùyǔjiāodiǎnxìtǒngzhīyǔyìjíyántángōngnéng
AT hsingchenliu semanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu
AT liúxīngchén semanticanddiscoursestudyonthevoicesysteminkanakanavu
_version_ 1718200724266942464