An Experimental Study of the Relationship among Collective Efficacy, Team Flow, Time Pressure and Team Performance : Collective Responsibility as Moderator

碩士 === 靜宜大學 === 企業管理學系 === 102 === The objects of this study aims to examine whether collective efficacy will influence team flow when a team members accomplish a task together. However, this study is also concerned about whether team flow may influence team performance which contains task performan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsai, Pei-Ju, 蔡佩汝
Other Authors: Fang, Hsiang-Ming
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/09943131207892297085
Description
Summary:碩士 === 靜宜大學 === 企業管理學系 === 102 === The objects of this study aims to examine whether collective efficacy will influence team flow when a team members accomplish a task together. However, this study is also concerned about whether team flow may influence team performance which contains task performance and team creativity. Second, time pressure will influence team flow and team performance. In addition, it also examined the moderator effect of collective responsibility on the relationship between collective efficacy and team flow. On the basis of purpose and literature review, this study proposed five hypotheses and a 2(collective responsibility: have, haven’t)×2(time pressure: high, low) experimental design was used. The subjects were 32 teams includes 139 students who took the same course in a university. Every team has to accomplish all the decision tasks and self-administered questionnaires from our researcher to collect the needed data by the research variables setting. To prevent the problem of common method variance in self-reported survey, the standard of task performance and team creativity are available by four experts. Finally, the major findings were as follows: (1) Collective efficacy has a significant positive influence on team flow when team members to carry out a task. (2) Team flow has a significant positive influence on team performance. (3) Time pressure has an inverted-U shaped relationship with team flow when team members to carry out a task. (4) Time pressure has an inverted-U shaped relationship with team performance when team members to carry out a task. (5) Collective responsibility has a significant positive moderating role on collective efficacy and team flow. Finally, some implication and suggestions for apply the findings to academic research and management practice, guidance and the directions for further research are suggested based on the findings and the limitations of this study.