The Relationship Between International Trade Personnel Attributes and Competency-based Training Effectiveness

博士 === 大葉大學 === 管理學院博士班 === 103 === This research is aiming at probing corrections between attributes of international trade personnel and their training effectiveness. Their job responsibilities and competency requirements for international trade personnel were defined through documentary research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shih, Hsueh-Chieh, 施雪切
Other Authors: Chen, Hsin-Tai
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87051771093412339506
Description
Summary:博士 === 大葉大學 === 管理學院博士班 === 103 === This research is aiming at probing corrections between attributes of international trade personnel and their training effectiveness. Their job responsibilities and competency requirements for international trade personnel were defined through documentary research and interviews with experts in this trade. The Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training outcomes were applied in evaluation and taken attributes for difference analysis. As a reference for future training, this research tried to find out training needs for different attributes in international trade personnel. Target of this research is based on international trade personnel training in central Taiwan. A 300- hundred questionnaire were distributed, and collected 232 valid responses. Data analysis were conducted through descriptive statistical analysis, t-test, single factor variation analysis, correction analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling analysis. The result found: trainees course satisfaction (reaction) has positive correction to competency improvement (learning); trainees competency improvement (learning) has positive correction to job performance (behavior); trainees course satisfaction (reaction) has positive correction to job performance (behavior); different trainees trainees attributes (times of training received) has great differences in responding to course satisfaction (reaction); different trainees attributes (sex, seniority, times of training received) has great differences in responding to competency improvement (learning); and different trainees attributes (times of training received) has great differences in responding to job performance (behavior).