The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example

碩士 === 大葉大學 === 管理學院碩士在職專班 === 103 === The followings are the empirical results from chapter four : the higher the ratio of managerial ownership of banking sectors, the better its corporate performance, showing a significantly positive correlation between the two; the higher percentage of large...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HUANG,HAN-JHANG, 黃漢章
Other Authors: JHANG,CHUN-BO
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/2b86qu
id ndltd-TW-103DYU01121016
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-103DYU011210162019-05-15T21:31:56Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/2b86qu The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example 公司治理對經營績效之影響: 以台灣之銀行業為例 HUANG,HAN-JHANG 黃漢章 碩士 大葉大學 管理學院碩士在職專班 103 The followings are the empirical results from chapter four : the higher the ratio of managerial ownership of banking sectors, the better its corporate performance, showing a significantly positive correlation between the two; the higher percentage of large shareholders’ ownership of the banks, the worse its corporate performance, showing they are significantly negatively correlated ; the larger of the directors and supervisors of the banks, the worse its corporate performance, which are significantly negatively correlated ; the higher the ratio of the external directors and supervisors of the banks, the better its business performance, showing they are significantly positively relevant ; when the chairman also acts as the general manager, corporate performance will be negatively correlated ; the larger the banks , the better its corporate performance, showing a significant and positive correlation ; the higher the debt ratio of the bank , the poor its corporate performance, showing a significantly negative correlation between them; quantitative easing policy and management performance are significantly correlated . There is some difference from different periods of time : the relation between directors' shareholding ratio and return on equity before the financial crisis ( 2004 ~ 2006 ) was positively related, in the financial crisis ( 2007 ~ 2008 ) was negatively correlated, and after the financial crisis ( 2009 ~ 2013 ) was not significantly related ; as for institutional investors’holding rate and return on assets, they were significantly not related either before the financial crisis ( 2004 ~ 2006 ) or after the financial crisis ( 2009 ~ 2013 ), they were positively related only in the financial crisis ( 2007 ~ 2008 ), showing the increase of institutional investors’holding rate in the financial crisis period indeed helped corporate performance. JHANG,CHUN-BO 張椿柏 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 48 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 大葉大學 === 管理學院碩士在職專班 === 103 === The followings are the empirical results from chapter four : the higher the ratio of managerial ownership of banking sectors, the better its corporate performance, showing a significantly positive correlation between the two; the higher percentage of large shareholders’ ownership of the banks, the worse its corporate performance, showing they are significantly negatively correlated ; the larger of the directors and supervisors of the banks, the worse its corporate performance, which are significantly negatively correlated ; the higher the ratio of the external directors and supervisors of the banks, the better its business performance, showing they are significantly positively relevant ; when the chairman also acts as the general manager, corporate performance will be negatively correlated ; the larger the banks , the better its corporate performance, showing a significant and positive correlation ; the higher the debt ratio of the bank , the poor its corporate performance, showing a significantly negative correlation between them; quantitative easing policy and management performance are significantly correlated . There is some difference from different periods of time : the relation between directors' shareholding ratio and return on equity before the financial crisis ( 2004 ~ 2006 ) was positively related, in the financial crisis ( 2007 ~ 2008 ) was negatively correlated, and after the financial crisis ( 2009 ~ 2013 ) was not significantly related ; as for institutional investors’holding rate and return on assets, they were significantly not related either before the financial crisis ( 2004 ~ 2006 ) or after the financial crisis ( 2009 ~ 2013 ), they were positively related only in the financial crisis ( 2007 ~ 2008 ), showing the increase of institutional investors’holding rate in the financial crisis period indeed helped corporate performance.
author2 JHANG,CHUN-BO
author_facet JHANG,CHUN-BO
HUANG,HAN-JHANG
黃漢章
author HUANG,HAN-JHANG
黃漢章
spellingShingle HUANG,HAN-JHANG
黃漢章
The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example
author_sort HUANG,HAN-JHANG
title The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example
title_short The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example
title_full The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example
title_fullStr The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Corporate Gorernace on Firm Performance: Banking as Example
title_sort impact of corporate gorernace on firm performance: banking as example
publishDate 2014
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/2b86qu
work_keys_str_mv AT huanghanjhang theimpactofcorporategorernaceonfirmperformancebankingasexample
AT huánghànzhāng theimpactofcorporategorernaceonfirmperformancebankingasexample
AT huanghanjhang gōngsīzhìlǐduìjīngyíngjīxiàozhīyǐngxiǎngyǐtáiwānzhīyínxíngyèwèilì
AT huánghànzhāng gōngsīzhìlǐduìjīngyíngjīxiàozhīyǐngxiǎngyǐtáiwānzhīyínxíngyèwèilì
AT huanghanjhang impactofcorporategorernaceonfirmperformancebankingasexample
AT huánghànzhāng impactofcorporategorernaceonfirmperformancebankingasexample
_version_ 1719115258528792576