| Summary: | 碩士 === 大葉大學 === 環境工程學系碩士在職專班 === 103 === The main purpose of this study is investigating the stationary sources of air pollution control operating permit issued by the Industrial Development Bureau and the Environmental Protection Agency, compare the correctness and differences of operating permit issued by the two units, in order to make concrete and feasible proposals for the future as Industrial Development Bureau and the Environmental Protection Agency to review the relevant reference unit and its future studies. For the first, this study mining operation permit issued by two units, comparison the formatting and relevant recording requirements, and then analyze two units that collocation air pollutant emissions reasonable for each process sources .
The main findings of this study are as follows：(1)There are significant differences between the two units in the relevant record provisions of the operating permit. (2) Industrial Development Bureau for industrial areas are metal plating industry of public or private premises, if they use organic solvents, may consider asking attach the relevant material safety data sheets when the permit application, to confirm whether they contain Volatile organic compounds. (3)The two units for combustion sources when using heavy oil, natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas as fuel, can consider to require the factories to than the correlation coefficient of air pollution control costs, and select similar emission coefficient SCCs to collocation emissions. (4)Two units can be considered to address the permit review human too little, too inexperienced or replace its high rate and other circumstances, in order to control the permit quality effectively of Changhua county.
|
|---|
