The effect of electronic review process on Institutional Review Board

• Main Authors: Rou-Jyun Lin, 林柔君
• Other Authors: Wen-Hsiang Lin
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2015
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/98510731715503764468

碩士 === 義守大學 === 管理碩博士班 === 103 === Institutional Review Board should be having a good system and the successful operation of the Review Committee, administrative efficiency is the most frequently criticized the review process. The criticism is not objective, but it becomes the important improvements for every IRB. After information technology upgrade, we can using the electronic review process to saving the message transfer of spend time, And improve deletion, enhance the efficiency of the Committee''s review, use of the electronic review process can store each case history review and related archives. It will improve Each Committee''s review about the access file problem, and reducing file loss and damage problems. Institutional Review Board since this review paper to electronic operations of review work and the relevant data provided by the study shows the electronic review process not only for the Commission to review the job under review work to save time, also apply the applicant、program host friendly operation, and you can use electronic review process to predominate the program schedule, and return the message immediately, Institutional Review Board can exclusion query waiting time and complain. The review process paper complex and tedious job of documents, electronic review process rests alternative will enhance the efficiency of the overall review of the operations. In addition, the review can take advantage of the electronic review process of data analysis in the Commission, such as members of the review of the efficiency of administrative examination efficiency. And further analysis of the quality review, whereby the Committee reviewed to identify problems and improve their problem or processes, thereby enhancing the efficiency and quality of the review committee, taking into account not only the quantity and quality, but could become major manufacturers and medical institutions reviewed human trials dependence and indicators.