On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 資訊科學與工程研究所 === 103 === Recently, Intra Line Copy (ILC) and Intra String Copy (ISC) have been introduced as effective means for screen content coding during the development of HEVC Screen Content Coding Extensions. Although conceptually sharing the same theoretical basis, which is e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liao, Ru-Ling, 廖如伶
Other Authors: Peng, Wen-Hsiao
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/45790410935844279487
id ndltd-TW-103NCTU5394155
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-103NCTU53941552017-07-09T04:30:12Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/45790410935844279487 On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding HEVC視窗視訊編碼之畫面內線型區塊複製與字串複製模式評比 Liao, Ru-Ling 廖如伶 碩士 國立交通大學 資訊科學與工程研究所 103 Recently, Intra Line Copy (ILC) and Intra String Copy (ISC) have been introduced as effective means for screen content coding during the development of HEVC Screen Content Coding Extensions. Although conceptually sharing the same theoretical basis, which is essentially string matching, they differ from each other in a number of significant ways. This thesis presents detailed comparisons between them with respect to their compression performance, runtime complexity and memory access bandwidth, in order to better understand their merits and faults. Experimental results indicate that they perform comparably to each other, with ILC generally performing better in coding mixed content and ISC better in coding pure screen content. When considering their impact on the memory access bandwidth, local search for ILC/ISC becomes more favorable than full-frame search in low-delay real-time applications. Peng, Wen-Hsiao 彭文孝 2015 學位論文 ; thesis 32 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 資訊科學與工程研究所 === 103 === Recently, Intra Line Copy (ILC) and Intra String Copy (ISC) have been introduced as effective means for screen content coding during the development of HEVC Screen Content Coding Extensions. Although conceptually sharing the same theoretical basis, which is essentially string matching, they differ from each other in a number of significant ways. This thesis presents detailed comparisons between them with respect to their compression performance, runtime complexity and memory access bandwidth, in order to better understand their merits and faults. Experimental results indicate that they perform comparably to each other, with ILC generally performing better in coding mixed content and ISC better in coding pure screen content. When considering their impact on the memory access bandwidth, local search for ILC/ISC becomes more favorable than full-frame search in low-delay real-time applications.
author2 Peng, Wen-Hsiao
author_facet Peng, Wen-Hsiao
Liao, Ru-Ling
廖如伶
author Liao, Ru-Ling
廖如伶
spellingShingle Liao, Ru-Ling
廖如伶
On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding
author_sort Liao, Ru-Ling
title On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding
title_short On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding
title_full On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding
title_fullStr On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding
title_full_unstemmed On Comparison of Intra Line Copy and Intra String Copy for HEVC Screen Content Coding
title_sort on comparison of intra line copy and intra string copy for hevc screen content coding
publishDate 2015
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/45790410935844279487
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoruling oncomparisonofintralinecopyandintrastringcopyforhevcscreencontentcoding
AT liàorúlíng oncomparisonofintralinecopyandintrastringcopyforhevcscreencontentcoding
AT liaoruling hevcshìchuāngshìxùnbiānmǎzhīhuàmiànnèixiànxíngqūkuàifùzhìyǔzìchuànfùzhìmóshìpíngbǐ
AT liàorúlíng hevcshìchuāngshìxùnbiānmǎzhīhuàmiànnèixiànxíngqūkuàifùzhìyǔzìchuànfùzhìmóshìpíngbǐ
_version_ 1718494252751650816