| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 數學系 === 103 === This study focused on students in the university four years of learning outcomes, the study sample was 99 students enrolled in the Central University to general health and disadvantaged students to compare the results of each semester. The main objective: to know whether the general performance of students and disadvantaged students have differences, investigate what percentage of students in larger schools rank level, and to investigate which of the categories of disadvantaged students rank the more excellent low-income households and to explore whether the family income level also affect the ranking in school, and various categories of performance, explore remote areas, students and the general student cumulative ranking during the school compare to see if the remote can affect performance in school.
Study mode based on four years of college academic performance in school, the students are divided into general health, disadvantaged students and students in remote areas, in order to do all kinds of other students compare the average value, in order to further explore the multiple correspondence analysis to student learning.
After analysis, the results of this study show the effectiveness of disadvantaged students and the general health is no obvious gap, but in the breakdown of vulnerable students with disabilities and Aboriginal student learning have a gap, need more help and care about their learning difficulties; high in remote areas of student learning outcomes in school are less good, more important in the four-year academic school sophomore, and freshman calculus to be more influential than English, it is proposed that college students should more attention to academic and freshman sophomore calculus, these results are confirmed multiple correspondence analysis diagram analysis and do explore the deeper step.
|
|---|
