Case Study on the Recognition and Feasibility Towards Sustainable Campus

• Main Authors: Hsi-jung Su, 蘇希容
• Other Authors: 曾迪華
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2015
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/32977516023200031705

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 環境工程研究所在職專班 === 103 === The main purpose of this study was to investigate the recognition and feasibility towards sustainable campus for a case private senior high school. The object of this research is expected to be as a reference for future executive direction and plans of sustainable campus development. The methods carried out in this study included campus survey of current statues and questionnaire survey of faculties and students, as well as insight interview of experts and scholars. According to the survey results of campus statues indicated that the case school met 12% and 74% of sustainable campus indicators in hardware and software, respectively. The statistical results of questionnaire survey of faculties and students revealed that the recognition of sustainable campus indicators were all above the significant level, mean highly agreed. In hardware indicators, the recognition of faculties was higher than that of students. The highest cognitive indicator was energy cycle and the next one was resource cycle. In software indicators, the cognition of environmental protection life for students was higher than that for faculties. Faculties with different gender and service seniority had no significant differences to the cognition of sustainable campus, but there were significant differences in teaching assortments. As for students, there were significant differences of cognition among students with different gender, grade, and assortment. The result of the interview with experts and scholars shown that the key point to promote the sustainable campus is “people”; the primary person is school leader or director. As for the feasibility to promote the sustainable campus, the experts and the school generally consider that insufficient campus space and budget, minute and complicated administration process, and lack of guidance from experts and scholars are the major difficulties. Therefore, the assistances from the governmental education in charge office are expected.