A Study on Protection Cases Decision of R.O.C. Civil Service-A Case Study of Civil Service Protection Cases from 1997 to 2012

• Main Authors: Lee, Hang-Ying, 李漢盈
• Other Authors: Hsu, Chen-Yuan
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/06036293672697682856

博士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 政治學研究所 === 103 === This research focused on books, journals, research reports, dissertations, research projects, official publications, interpretation of Justices of the Constitutional court and reports of Civil Service Protection and Training Commission. Those bibliographies related to civil service protection which using to make a adequate dissertation. Content Analysis was main research method in this dissertation. It concentrated on civil service protection event decision reports from 1997 to 2012. At the same time, by exercised documentary analysis and comparative research methods to study on statistical distribution of civil service protection events, influencing factors to accuse, withdrawal reasons and subsequent enforcements, it help us provide exactly research suggestions to perfect civil service protection institutions. According to the purpose, this research involved seven chapters. Chapter 1 was introduction. Chapter 2 provided fundamental theories and literature reviews. Chapter 3 mainly related to research design and enforcement. Chapter 4 was statistics of government agencies and the determinations which withdrawn by Civil Service Protection and Training Commission. Chapter 5 was statistics of civil services and the determinations which withdrawn by Civil Service Protection and Training Commission. Chapter 6 was statistics of protection events and the determinations which withdrawn by Civil Service Protection and Training Commission. In addition, it involved influence elements analysis. Finally, chapter 7 was conclusions and suggestions for future research. The main finding and outcome involved 5 parts. First, reviewing decisions of the civil service protection event determination by central competent authorities was dismissed. Second, reviewing decisions of the civil service protection event determination by local authorities was withdrawn. Third, reviewing decisions of the civil service protection event determination by on-job employees was withdrawn. Fourth, reviewing decisions of the civil service protection event determination was withdrawn by appear to make statements. Those were the highest proportion. The last, the lowest proportions on reviewing decisions of the civil service protection event determination was withdrawn after 2003.