The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 法律學研究所 === 103 === For protecting the investors in a transaction of financial instruments, the ”Financial Consumer Protection Law” was enacted at 30th Dec 2011. The constituent elements of “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” which financial institution is required in fina...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2015
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65779282936897032410 |
id |
ndltd-TW-103NTU05194084 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-103NTU051940842016-11-19T04:09:55Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65779282936897032410 The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation 日本金融消費者保護法中說明義務與適合性原則之建構 Yi-Hsien Lin 林宜賢 碩士 國立臺灣大學 法律學研究所 103 For protecting the investors in a transaction of financial instruments, the ”Financial Consumer Protection Law” was enacted at 30th Dec 2011. The constituent elements of “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” which financial institution is required in financial transaction is expressly described in this law, and the liability for damages of failing to perform “disclosure duty” and of breach of “suitability principal” is also included in this law. In early practice of law in our country, it’s hard to imagine that financial institutions are liable for their defective conduct in a financial transaction which cause damages to investors, but this conception is not comply with the purpose for protecting investors. After the enactment of the ”Financial Consumer Protection Law”, it’s still doubtful that the implement of the law, especially about the liability for damages of failing to perform “disclosure duty” and of breach of “suitability principal”, will achieve the respected effect of the statute in practice of law in our country. Observing the law of Japan, which is adopting the “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” that financial institution is required, it has developed, from accumulation of practice and theory of law for a long time, criteria about the constituent elements of “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal”, and criteria about other extended duties such as “duty to advice” or “duty of consumer intelligence gathering”, and even criteria about the comparative negligence of investors. All about that may be a good reference for Taiwan. In order to construct the complete system about liability for damages of failing to perform “disclosure duty” and of breach of “suitability principal”, this article focused on the comparison with the regulations, theory and the conception in practicing law about “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” in Japan. And this article also pointed out the controversial issues in Japan, for improving the law in our country to be accordant with the purpose of protecting financial consumers. Ying-Hsin Tsai 蔡英欣 2015 學位論文 ; thesis 197 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 法律學研究所 === 103 === For protecting the investors in a transaction of financial instruments, the ”Financial Consumer Protection Law” was enacted at 30th Dec 2011. The constituent elements of “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” which financial institution is required in financial transaction is expressly described in this law, and the liability for damages of failing to perform “disclosure duty” and of breach of “suitability principal” is also included in this law.
In early practice of law in our country, it’s hard to imagine that financial institutions are liable for their defective conduct in a financial transaction which cause damages to investors, but this conception is not comply with the purpose for protecting investors. After the enactment of the ”Financial Consumer Protection Law”, it’s still doubtful that the implement of the law, especially about the liability for damages of failing to perform “disclosure duty” and of breach of “suitability principal”, will achieve the respected effect of the statute in practice of law in our country.
Observing the law of Japan, which is adopting the “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” that financial institution is required, it has developed, from accumulation of practice and theory of law for a long time, criteria about the constituent elements of “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal”, and criteria about other extended duties such as “duty to advice” or “duty of consumer intelligence gathering”, and even criteria about the comparative negligence of investors. All about that may be a good reference for Taiwan.
In order to construct the complete system about liability for damages of failing to perform “disclosure duty” and of breach of “suitability principal”, this article focused on the comparison with the regulations, theory and the conception in practicing law about “disclosure duty” and “suitability principal” in Japan. And this article also pointed out the controversial issues in Japan, for improving the law in our country to be accordant with the purpose of protecting financial consumers.
|
author2 |
Ying-Hsin Tsai |
author_facet |
Ying-Hsin Tsai Yi-Hsien Lin 林宜賢 |
author |
Yi-Hsien Lin 林宜賢 |
spellingShingle |
Yi-Hsien Lin 林宜賢 The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation |
author_sort |
Yi-Hsien Lin |
title |
The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation |
title_short |
The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation |
title_full |
The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation |
title_fullStr |
The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in Japan Financial Consumer Protection Regulation |
title_sort |
structure of disclosure duty and the suitability principal in japan financial consumer protection regulation |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65779282936897032410 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yihsienlin thestructureofdisclosuredutyandthesuitabilityprincipalinjapanfinancialconsumerprotectionregulation AT línyíxián thestructureofdisclosuredutyandthesuitabilityprincipalinjapanfinancialconsumerprotectionregulation AT yihsienlin rìběnjīnróngxiāofèizhěbǎohùfǎzhōngshuōmíngyìwùyǔshìhéxìngyuánzézhījiàngòu AT línyíxián rìběnjīnróngxiāofèizhěbǎohùfǎzhōngshuōmíngyìwùyǔshìhéxìngyuánzézhījiàngòu AT yihsienlin structureofdisclosuredutyandthesuitabilityprincipalinjapanfinancialconsumerprotectionregulation AT línyíxián structureofdisclosuredutyandthesuitabilityprincipalinjapanfinancialconsumerprotectionregulation |
_version_ |
1718394854467174400 |