The Study of Case Analysis of Job Seeker’s Behavioral Characteristics

• Main Authors: HSU, SHUN-JU, 徐順儒
• Other Authors: Lo, Yen-Fen
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2015
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/06703904307096224430

碩士 === 實踐大學 === 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 === 103 === Biotechnology talents, the lifeblood of the biotechnology industry, are attracting more and more attention in Taiwan. A great deal of information can be gathered from a job interview process. Apart from the appearance of job applicants and conversation styles, one can also observe their behaviors and reactions from the interaction between the interviewer and interviewee. All in all, if the companies are able to apply multiple tools and measurements to evaluate job applicants, they will stand a much better chance of hiring the right person. The study explores how Company X, in the biotechnology industry, gets to know the characteristics and abilities of five cases of job applicants during the recruitment and interview process. In addition to content analysis and documentary analysis, factor analysis is used in this study, including factors such as forty four behavioral dimensions collected by 104 Corporation, KSAO competency model, impression management strategy, and person-organization fit. Through the analysis of Question 1, the study collects the characteristics of competency from the five cases of job applicants, which can serve as the standards for the Recruitment for Biotechnology Industry. Question 2 analyzes the ideal condition presented by the job applicants after they recognize the circumstance. The study found that the job applicants will take the impression management approach when they perceive the interviewer consider them unfit for work. Under this circumstance, the study suggests that the interviewer should observe the applicants’ behaviors in an effective-designed daily life circumstance, and then make the applicants show their true colors without any warning. This way, the personalities of the applicants can be evaluated more precisely. The management implication, limitations of the study and the recommendations for future research are advised according to the research result.