Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players

碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 休閒事業管理系 === 104 === In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the playe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsiu-Jung Hsieh, 謝秀絨
Other Authors: Chi-Yueh Hsu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66149038822603885937
id ndltd-TW-104CYUT0675024
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104CYUT06750242017-07-30T04:41:02Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66149038822603885937 Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players 桌球選手不同握拍法技戰術之研究 Hsiu-Jung Hsieh 謝秀絨 碩士 朝陽科技大學 休閒事業管理系 104 In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the players who had different grips and attended the World Snooker Championship and China Open from 2013 to 2016 to study. the author selected 5 game each of the matches in which the players used penhold backhand and shakehand, and recorded the singles of 47 innings within 10 games. the author used observational study methods for the technical login, and then organized various tables and the raw data. Later, the author used the SPSS statistical program for statistical analysis. The results could be obtained and found as below. 1. No matter what the players chose to use penhold backhand or shakehand, the stage in serving the ball to attack, in receiving the serve to attack and the stalemate segment are all the same important assessment techniques. 2. According to the analysis of three-stage technicals from different grips, it showed us that the scoring rate was 70.9% for the handshakers, while for the penhold backhand players, 55.43%. The accurancy of the handshakers is highner than the penhold backhand players'. The scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact was good. On the stalemate segment, the scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact didn't reach targets. The penhold backhand players performed better than shakehanders on scoring rate. 3. It showed no significant differences between the scoring rate and usage rate of three-stage technicals in which the players performed with different different grips . 4. It showed no significant differences between the win-lose situation and three-stage technicals. Chi-Yueh Hsu Ming-Yueh Wang 許吉越 王明月 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 休閒事業管理系 === 104 === In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the players who had different grips and attended the World Snooker Championship and China Open from 2013 to 2016 to study. the author selected 5 game each of the matches in which the players used penhold backhand and shakehand, and recorded the singles of 47 innings within 10 games. the author used observational study methods for the technical login, and then organized various tables and the raw data. Later, the author used the SPSS statistical program for statistical analysis. The results could be obtained and found as below. 1. No matter what the players chose to use penhold backhand or shakehand, the stage in serving the ball to attack, in receiving the serve to attack and the stalemate segment are all the same important assessment techniques. 2. According to the analysis of three-stage technicals from different grips, it showed us that the scoring rate was 70.9% for the handshakers, while for the penhold backhand players, 55.43%. The accurancy of the handshakers is highner than the penhold backhand players'. The scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact was good. On the stalemate segment, the scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact didn't reach targets. The penhold backhand players performed better than shakehanders on scoring rate. 3. It showed no significant differences between the scoring rate and usage rate of three-stage technicals in which the players performed with different different grips . 4. It showed no significant differences between the win-lose situation and three-stage technicals.
author2 Chi-Yueh Hsu
author_facet Chi-Yueh Hsu
Hsiu-Jung Hsieh
謝秀絨
author Hsiu-Jung Hsieh
謝秀絨
spellingShingle Hsiu-Jung Hsieh
謝秀絨
Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
author_sort Hsiu-Jung Hsieh
title Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
title_short Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
title_full Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
title_fullStr Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
title_full_unstemmed Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
title_sort research on techniques and tactics of different grip types used by table tennis players
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66149038822603885937
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiujunghsieh researchontechniquesandtacticsofdifferentgriptypesusedbytabletennisplayers
AT xièxiùróng researchontechniquesandtacticsofdifferentgriptypesusedbytabletennisplayers
AT hsiujunghsieh zhuōqiúxuǎnshǒubùtóngwòpāifǎjìzhànshùzhīyánjiū
AT xièxiùróng zhuōqiúxuǎnshǒubùtóngwòpāifǎjìzhànshùzhīyánjiū
_version_ 1718508554689708032