Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players
碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 休閒事業管理系 === 104 === In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the playe...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2016
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66149038822603885937 |
id |
ndltd-TW-104CYUT0675024 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-104CYUT06750242017-07-30T04:41:02Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66149038822603885937 Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players 桌球選手不同握拍法技戰術之研究 Hsiu-Jung Hsieh 謝秀絨 碩士 朝陽科技大學 休閒事業管理系 104 In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the players who had different grips and attended the World Snooker Championship and China Open from 2013 to 2016 to study. the author selected 5 game each of the matches in which the players used penhold backhand and shakehand, and recorded the singles of 47 innings within 10 games. the author used observational study methods for the technical login, and then organized various tables and the raw data. Later, the author used the SPSS statistical program for statistical analysis. The results could be obtained and found as below. 1. No matter what the players chose to use penhold backhand or shakehand, the stage in serving the ball to attack, in receiving the serve to attack and the stalemate segment are all the same important assessment techniques. 2. According to the analysis of three-stage technicals from different grips, it showed us that the scoring rate was 70.9% for the handshakers, while for the penhold backhand players, 55.43%. The accurancy of the handshakers is highner than the penhold backhand players'. The scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact was good. On the stalemate segment, the scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact didn't reach targets. The penhold backhand players performed better than shakehanders on scoring rate. 3. It showed no significant differences between the scoring rate and usage rate of three-stage technicals in which the players performed with different different grips . 4. It showed no significant differences between the win-lose situation and three-stage technicals. Chi-Yueh Hsu Ming-Yueh Wang 許吉越 王明月 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 休閒事業管理系 === 104 === In this study, the author did the research on every table tennis player about their performance of different grips from technical and tactical methods and analyzed the differences in the performance of the technical and tactical grips. The author chose the players who had different grips and attended the World Snooker Championship and China Open from 2013 to 2016 to study. the author selected 5 game each of the matches in which the players used penhold backhand and shakehand, and recorded the singles of 47 innings within 10 games. the author used observational study methods for the technical login, and then organized various tables and the raw data. Later, the author used the SPSS statistical program for statistical analysis. The results could be obtained and found as below.
1. No matter what the players chose to use penhold backhand or shakehand, the stage in serving the ball to attack, in receiving the serve to attack and the stalemate segment are all the same important assessment techniques.
2. According to the analysis of three-stage technicals from different grips, it showed us that the scoring rate was 70.9% for the handshakers, while for the penhold backhand players, 55.43%. The accurancy of the handshakers is highner than the penhold backhand players'. The scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact was good. On the stalemate segment, the scoring rate and usage of penhold backhand and shakehand for the stage in receiving the serve to attact didn't reach targets. The penhold backhand players performed better than shakehanders on scoring rate.
3. It showed no significant differences between the scoring rate and usage rate of three-stage technicals in which the players performed with different different grips .
4. It showed no significant differences between the win-lose situation and three-stage technicals.
|
author2 |
Chi-Yueh Hsu |
author_facet |
Chi-Yueh Hsu Hsiu-Jung Hsieh 謝秀絨 |
author |
Hsiu-Jung Hsieh 謝秀絨 |
spellingShingle |
Hsiu-Jung Hsieh 謝秀絨 Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players |
author_sort |
Hsiu-Jung Hsieh |
title |
Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players |
title_short |
Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players |
title_full |
Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players |
title_fullStr |
Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research on Techniques and Tactics of Different Grip Types Used by Table Tennis Players |
title_sort |
research on techniques and tactics of different grip types used by table tennis players |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66149038822603885937 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hsiujunghsieh researchontechniquesandtacticsofdifferentgriptypesusedbytabletennisplayers AT xièxiùróng researchontechniquesandtacticsofdifferentgriptypesusedbytabletennisplayers AT hsiujunghsieh zhuōqiúxuǎnshǒubùtóngwòpāifǎjìzhànshùzhīyánjiū AT xièxiùróng zhuōqiúxuǎnshǒubùtóngwòpāifǎjìzhànshùzhīyánjiū |
_version_ |
1718508554689708032 |