| Summary: | 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 景觀設計學系碩士班 === 103 === "Battlefield" is the most popular impression to Kinmen. Underthe international Cold War atmosphere, mailitary control system was strictly enforced in Kinmen which is military dominant considerationin all aspects from 1949 to 1992. As the infrastructures was constructed in Taiwan, such as highways, while merely underground tunnels and military facilities were built in Kinmen. In November 7, 1992 after the lifting on military restriction and opening up to tourism, it has recovered mystery of Kinmen from battlefield. However, the implementation of the national army “Jingshi Project" and "Jingjin Project ", has result in the original dense battlefield discarded , or even abandoned continually due to the reduction in troops. How to re-use the discarded military space is currently a significant subject in Kinmen.
Recently, on purpose of tourism development, part of the discarded military facilities were proceeded to serious spatial landscape transformation has aroused the vitality of military field and recreated a different space landscape amenities of life, changing the stereotypical impression of military space, creating historical significance of Culture and Tourism issued a new milestone for Kinmen. However, as indicated by the Kinmen military space resources survey and valuation and activation use planned in advance planning results report shows that the release or release camp case, around two hundred military vacant spots were identified after reviewing by the defense ministry in Kinmen. "Islands building regulations to buy back the land" open data show that as of 103 years, a total of 867 pen restitution or recover possession of the land survey inventory data, the number of land in the past worked for the camp is considerable.
The facilities are fortifications for the wartime not only be the indelible historical memory and cultural space, but also the resources in tourism developments in the future. The study is aiming to establish a set of evaluation indicators as well as the relative weights via AHP and Delphi Method, for the evaluation for tourism development of discarded military space after appropriation. Besides, to avoid introducing overly optimistic or subjective reuse practices due to the suddenly attention drawing. Hopefully, the results may provide to the projects in the suitability evaluation of unused military facilities in preliminary stage.
Through the established model of AHP hierarchical analysis, the results of this study are divided into the following three points:
1. Experience Sightseeing assess the weight, as opposed to the conditions surrounding the camp barracks itself and the resources condition factor, "the barracks itself condition (0.7111)" was the dominant condition Experiencing sightseeing. In addition, hands-on program, priority should be to improve the "traffic conditions (0.1938)" of attention.
2. Sightseeing viewing assess weights, "the barracks itself condition" and "barracks surrounding resources" condition factor, the presentation of both weights are similar, "the barracks surrounding resources (0.5623)" relatively "barracks itself condition (0.4377)" multi-valued Some. In viewing type scheme, the "base state (0.2077)" factor of the relatively weak.
3. Sightseeing assess industry weights, and experience-based sightseeing contrary, with respect to the barracks itself and conditions of the conditions surrounding the barracks resource factors "surrounding the barracks resources (0.7505)" was the dominant industrial type sightseeing condition. In addition, industrial-type program, priority should be to improve the "base state (0.229)" of attention.
According to analysis mode, it can be used as the Kinmen Resources Development Orientation and Development Model sightseeing when the reference. Comments and based on the assessment of the relative weight and to test each base future operable to improve the environment, improve the management of information.
On the subsequent amendments to this research model of the study were divided into four points:
1. Improve the model validity
2. Suitability factors review
3. Review how to use the model
4. Other tourist attractions
In order to improve the verification of the validity of the results, we should review the suitability factors. After evaluating the policy standard, we can know what this type of development the focus and priority improvement factors. Kinmen's rich cultural tourism resources, possessed diversity, contains many levels, this research field do sightseeing section discusses the future in respect of other tourism resources such as overseas Chinese culture, Taiwanese tourist settlement of recycling do model assessment review.
|
|---|
