Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems

碩士 === 華夏科技大學 === 資產與物業管理研究所 === 104 === Advances in technology stimulates industrialization and automation of the whole society, a lot of skyscrapers and factories, and creates a labor-intensive, commercial electrification and factory automation. Fire accident is not limited to Class A fires and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang Yu-Chun, 張育鈞
Other Authors: Lin Wen-Hsing
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39877682344704879812
id ndltd-TW-104HWH01457006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104HWH014570062016-11-18T04:43:20Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39877682344704879812 Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems 以層級分析法評估惰性滅火系統用於高產值防護區之定量評比 Chang Yu-Chun 張育鈞 碩士 華夏科技大學 資產與物業管理研究所 104 Advances in technology stimulates industrialization and automation of the whole society, a lot of skyscrapers and factories, and creates a labor-intensive, commercial electrification and factory automation. Fire accident is not limited to Class A fires and the major accidents are often caused by the class C electrical fire, and such electrical room or a building is often the most important high-value plant-protection zone. Therefore, how to choose the staff, the best fire protection of pharmaceutical assets can be done while protecting the lives and safety and disaster prevention and take into account environmental protection, non-toxic, does not affect the Earth's eco-effective extinguishing agent is the focus of the study. This study is to choose 4 kinds of commonly used inert extinguishing system (1) IG-01, i.e., 100% argon gas, (2) IG-55, i.e. in a combination of 50% nitrogen and 50% argon, (3) IG-541, i.e., 52% nitrogen, 40% argon and combinations of 8% CO2, (4) CO2, i.e. 100% carbon dioxide. Through the questionnaires for 12 fire experts in firefighting field based on the criterias of A. personnel security B. environmental Impact C. cost considerations D. extinguishing efficiency and line item features, and compare with this 4-inert extinguishing agent as a quantization competitions. The result we get is: IG-541: 39.4%> IG-55: 24.3%> IG-01: 19.9%> CO2: 16.5%. Concluded: A. personnel safety is the highest priority to the majority of the experts of the project, and C. cost considerations is the final consideration of the project. Four kinds of inert extinguishing agents have advantages and disadvantages respectively. It allows users to choose through this research a more secure, environmental protection and is suitable inert extinguishing agent protection equipment and it is the purposes of this study. This study has led me further understand the characteristics of inert fire extinguishing system by reviewing the literature and understanding the regulations, and the further research of each of inert extinguishing system. By the paper was published, we share with the industry to a better understanding of the characteristics of Inert automatic fire extinguishing system features, and on the future use of practice to select the more appropriate fire suppression system and customer for personnel safety and environmentally friendly. Lin Wen-Hsing 林文興 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 103 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 華夏科技大學 === 資產與物業管理研究所 === 104 === Advances in technology stimulates industrialization and automation of the whole society, a lot of skyscrapers and factories, and creates a labor-intensive, commercial electrification and factory automation. Fire accident is not limited to Class A fires and the major accidents are often caused by the class C electrical fire, and such electrical room or a building is often the most important high-value plant-protection zone. Therefore, how to choose the staff, the best fire protection of pharmaceutical assets can be done while protecting the lives and safety and disaster prevention and take into account environmental protection, non-toxic, does not affect the Earth's eco-effective extinguishing agent is the focus of the study. This study is to choose 4 kinds of commonly used inert extinguishing system (1) IG-01, i.e., 100% argon gas, (2) IG-55, i.e. in a combination of 50% nitrogen and 50% argon, (3) IG-541, i.e., 52% nitrogen, 40% argon and combinations of 8% CO2, (4) CO2, i.e. 100% carbon dioxide. Through the questionnaires for 12 fire experts in firefighting field based on the criterias of A. personnel security B. environmental Impact C. cost considerations D. extinguishing efficiency and line item features, and compare with this 4-inert extinguishing agent as a quantization competitions. The result we get is: IG-541: 39.4%> IG-55: 24.3%> IG-01: 19.9%> CO2: 16.5%. Concluded: A. personnel safety is the highest priority to the majority of the experts of the project, and C. cost considerations is the final consideration of the project. Four kinds of inert extinguishing agents have advantages and disadvantages respectively. It allows users to choose through this research a more secure, environmental protection and is suitable inert extinguishing agent protection equipment and it is the purposes of this study. This study has led me further understand the characteristics of inert fire extinguishing system by reviewing the literature and understanding the regulations, and the further research of each of inert extinguishing system. By the paper was published, we share with the industry to a better understanding of the characteristics of Inert automatic fire extinguishing system features, and on the future use of practice to select the more appropriate fire suppression system and customer for personnel safety and environmentally friendly.
author2 Lin Wen-Hsing
author_facet Lin Wen-Hsing
Chang Yu-Chun
張育鈞
author Chang Yu-Chun
張育鈞
spellingShingle Chang Yu-Chun
張育鈞
Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems
author_sort Chang Yu-Chun
title Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems
title_short Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems
title_full Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems
title_fullStr Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)Approach for Appraisal Selection on Inert Fire Extinguishing Systems
title_sort analytical hierarchy process(ahp)approach for appraisal selection on inert fire extinguishing systems
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39877682344704879812
work_keys_str_mv AT changyuchun analyticalhierarchyprocessahpapproachforappraisalselectiononinertfireextinguishingsystems
AT zhāngyùjūn analyticalhierarchyprocessahpapproachforappraisalselectiononinertfireextinguishingsystems
AT changyuchun yǐcéngjífēnxīfǎpínggūduòxìngmièhuǒxìtǒngyòngyúgāochǎnzhífánghùqūzhīdìngliàngpíngbǐ
AT zhāngyùjūn yǐcéngjífēnxīfǎpínggūduòxìngmièhuǒxìtǒngyòngyúgāochǎnzhífánghùqūzhīdìngliàngpíngbǐ
_version_ 1718394548993916928