| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 輔導與諮商學系所 === 104 === This study in the collection and analysis of different divisions of vocational students interested in test data, the use of six types of calculated average Holland Higher divisions and other groups interested in code. Then control Lin Pei Jun (2012) according to national tests and questionnaires in raw materials, and the US O * NET and CIP data are sorted out divisions interest code, the difference comparison of three interest code.
The study sample is in a vocational school and sophomore year, issued a total of 1420 parts License Agreement recovered 673 valid samples, it contains a total of 21 divisions, representing 11 groups do not. Then use the students' interest in test scores, respectively, to obtain divisions and interest groups do not code in two ways, one is to use the same family of six types of student average scores, the average score obtained interest in the code; the other is the use of six types of test scores sorted after sorting and then averaging the average sort of interest codes obtained. By comparison the average interest selection sort code as the code used in this research and discussion.
The results found that among three ways (judgment method, empirical method and incumbent method) interest generated code has a considerable degree of similarity, and the differences may be among vocational students choose to attend in real time of divisions, in addition to interest there are other important considerations in the decision, or student interest and the resulting drop for the actual nature of the work content in the workplace between. According to research findings, put forward two recommendations for future research.
|
|---|
