The Study on National Compensation for Campus Sexual Assault ,Sexual Harassment or Sexual bullying events：Base on the Negligent act of Educators.

• Main Authors: LU,RUI-FANG, 盧瑞芳
• Other Authors: Lin,Tsang-Tu
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2015
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/374b48

碩士 === 國防大學 === 法律學系 === 104 === After the implementation of nine-year compulsory education, the education popularity in Taiwan is very high. The campus life can be called as common memories of all citizens. The Ministry of Education is planning to implement the nine-year national education extended to twelve years of national basic education, therefore, Campus life is not only a necessary process, the time getting along with peers and teachers also increase with the years. In recent years, however, campus gender equality event, under the print media and news reporters reporting, appear in front of people in a non-ignorable frequency. In order to promote substantive gender equality, eliminate gender discrimination, uphold human dignity, improve and establish education resources, and protect student’s right to education, our government set up Gender Equity Education Act on 23 June 2004. From the standpoint of protection of student rights to education, the code requests the schools to work on campus gender equality event by following the standard operation process, and requires educators to do a lot of obligations. Although the conception is good, the practical operation is not complete. Therefore, this essay attempts to analyze and summarize the obligations, which is common and core to the educators according to the law on campus gender equality event. By which, to systematize and clear the obligations. Then to the practical operation of educators in violation of the foregoing obligations, explores the patterns and the legal effects of the violation may lead to, and derives the possibility of State liability. And focus on the educator’s breach of obligations as to the gender equality event, constructs the relationship between the obligation of omission and State liability. At last, compares theoretical discussion with the relevant decision on the recent practice, and comments those verdict.