| Summary: | 碩士 === 開南大學 === 商學院碩士在職專班 === 105 === Leadership is a process where the leader, through observation of interactions of organizational members, helps steer his members to focus on achieving a specific goal. Organizational commitments are attitudes or traits that enable organizational members to acknowledge the ideas of an organization and continue working for the organization. Different leadership styles will result in different training performance and organizational acknowledgement for the targets in this study due to discrepancies in their familiarity with the coaching professions. Therefore, this study will explore the effects of leadership styles of baseball coaches on their training performance. The sample targets for the questionnaires are baseball coaches of middle and elementary schools in Taoyuan City, and there are 50 total valid questionnaires.
Through empirical analysis, this study reveals that 1. The reliability of the determinants of personality traits, leadership style, and training performance are in accordance with the literature suggested reliability standards. 2. Transformational leadership and transactional leadership both have positive correlations with training performance and with each other. 3. There is no apparent correlation between personality traits and training performance. There is a positive correlation between personality traits and both transactional leadership and transformational leadership. 4. The better the transformational leadership the higher the training performance. This supports H1 hypothesis. 5. The better the transactional leadership the higher the training performance. This supports H2 hypothesis. 6. The H3 hypothesis that transformational leadership results in a higher training performance than transactional leadership is not supported. 7. The H4-1 hypothesis that the better internal locus control personality trait is the higher the training performance is not supported. 8. The H4-2 hypothesis that the better external locus control personality trait is the higher the training performance is not supported. 9. The H6 hypothesis that personality trait is an interference variable for the relationship between leadership style and training performance is supported since the relationship no longer has an apparent correlation. 10. From the perspective of external locus control personality, single interviewees have far better performance than those married. There is no significant difference on other variables between middle school coaches with different marriage status. It shows that the coach’s marriage status has no significant bearing on the relationship between internal locus control personality, leadership style, and training performance.
|
|---|
