| Summary: | 碩士 === 銘傳大學 === 社會與安全管理學系兩岸關係與安全管理碩士在職專班 === 105 === Government since 2000 and the 2008 two times party round for the, and January 16, 2016 President and the legislators election, and again once through democratic legal program, by national people followed selected strike system elected new of Heads of State and the Congress representative, and implementation election program public personnel also does according to "administrative neutrality", and "law administrative" legal spirit implementation selected works, addition station in judicial position of method works Department the place prosecutorial Department, and survey Council around survey at station, in implementation bribery check justice matters, also comply with the legal procedures for gathering evidence and investigation, there is no question the justice unit investigating bribery of justice matters, judicial government system gain the public trust, "administrative neutrality" Ascension of the spirit of is important.
Writing this paper originated in the student discussion on judicial matters, found January 14, 2012 the eighth regional legislative election, Sanchong New Taipei City, the DPP legislator Gao Zhipeng（高志鵬）candidates against KMT Li Ganlong（李乾龍）. Li Ganlong results by more than 1000 votes lost by the DPP. Prosecutors launch investigation on January 12, 2012 Sanchong in Delhi Vil. Chief Ye and 15 Chief buying event in the brilliance, KMT questioned the prosecutors for investigation of the relative time violating administrative neutrality, party services.
July 27, 2016 New Taipei District Procecutors Office command investigation service investigating Sanchong New Taipei City, Guanghua Vil. election bribery case, and claims custody Ke candidates allowed to continue investigation in the difference of the polling date is July 30 in three days, investigation timing also raised discussion of administrative neutrality, while still in the investigation phase of the case, in this fine discussion.
So this papers in discussion related administrative neutral literature, news media reported judicial units has no against administrative neutral matters, and through interview related survey Council survey personnel, and grass-roots in long public opinion representative, and grass-roots administrative public personnel, period can from interview process in the, found related judicial investigation and administrative neutral conflict matters, proposed related law administrative, and established Chief personnel specification recommends, then established judicial personnel and the grass-roots on administrative neutral of confidence, judicial check adjustable units investigation bribery related guidelines, guarantees judicial human rights of research results.
|
|---|
