The Psychological Pressure and Response of Employees in the Financial Industry Mergers and Acquisitions: A Case Study of D Security Company

碩士 === 美和科技大學 === 企業管理系經營管理碩士班 === 105 === The domestic financial industry to set up a large number of financial control companies, the main financial control of the main business to banks, securities, insurance and so on. Integration of the Group's resources for cross-industry marketing, expec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui-Lien Hsieh, 謝慧蓮
Other Authors: Yu-Chuan Tu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9hz6ud
Description
Summary:碩士 === 美和科技大學 === 企業管理系經營管理碩士班 === 105 === The domestic financial industry to set up a large number of financial control companies, the main financial control of the main business to banks, securities, insurance and so on. Integration of the Group's resources for cross-industry marketing, expect to multi-oriented operating operations, reduce operational risk and increase business areas. In the financial industry consolidation case, most of the industry seek to merge goals, focusing on the financial side and strategy side. People's problems, always in the decision after the merger began to consider. However, it is often not clear that the direction and vision of future members of the organization will lead to changes in cognition, mood, working environment and morale. In this study, the results of the survey were carried out. The effective recovery rate was 71.25% for those who had merged and may be merged with brokerage firms and staff members and brokerage institutions. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22 software to verify this paper. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: 1. M & A pressure in the personal feelings of pressure on the individual pressure is significant. 2. The pressure of mergers and acquisitions pressure and corporate culture pressure on the pressure response system is significant. 3. M & A pressure on the pressure in response to the main surface is not significant. 4. Personal stress on the pressure response system is significant; the main surface is not significant. 5. Workplace work on the pressure response system is not significant; the main surface is significant but the intensity is not high. 6. Individual households have no significant effect on the system of stress; the main face is significant but the intensity is low.