The Brexit referendum and European integration
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班 === 105 === In 1973, the United Kingdom officially joined European integration and became a member of the European Community. In June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a public vote for Brexit and decided to leave the European Union (EU). As the second largest eco...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9d6fx2 |
id |
ndltd-TW-105NCCU5025014 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-105NCCU50250142018-06-25T06:15:18Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9d6fx2 The Brexit referendum and European integration 英國脫歐公投與歐洲統合 黎蕙綾 碩士 國立政治大學 國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班 105 In 1973, the United Kingdom officially joined European integration and became a member of the European Community. In June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a public vote for Brexit and decided to leave the European Union (EU). As the second largest economy in the EU, the United Kingdom is determined to terminate the 43-year relationship with the EU. The EU economic and social policy core contents comprise four basic freedoms, namely, goods, capital, people, and services. Euro and the Schengen Agreement are the two pillars supporting the EU. However, the European debt crisis, Syrian refugees, and terrorist attacks have affected the stability of the two pillars. Various factors cause British people to believe that it is unworthy of continuing European integration because the United Kingdom benefits from the EU at a cost of losing more. This study investigates the history of coopetition between the United Kingdom and the EU and uses interdependence theory to analyse the economic consideration of the United Kingdom to join the EU, the context of the Brexit vote, and the viewpoints of advocates and opposition for remaining in the EU. We also analyse different dimensions, including trade, job opportunity, the EU membership fee, European debt crisis, immigrants, and border control, as well as the effect of Breixt on both the UK itself and the EU. In addition, because of the centralization trend of the EU, the United Kingdom claims to retrieve the losing autonomy of legal regulation, fiscal governance, and immigration control. After the decision of leaving the EU was determined, the UK Prime Minister Theresa Mary May proposed a Brexit White Paper in 2017, declaring that the United Kingdom will leave the EU completely. Long and complicated negotiations between the United Kingdom and the EU are expected. From the Brexit issue to Trump elected as the US president, these events reveal a trend of antiglobalisation, ethnic nationalism, and refusal to yield sovereignty to supranational organisations such as the EU. This trend is changing the politics in the Europe and the United States; thus, the present study is conducted to preliminarily identify the rationale behind this trend. 郭武平 學位論文 ; thesis 120 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班 === 105 === In 1973, the United Kingdom officially joined European integration and became a member of the European Community. In June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a public vote for Brexit and decided to leave the European Union (EU).
As the second largest economy in the EU, the United Kingdom is determined to terminate the 43-year relationship with the EU.
The EU economic and social policy core contents comprise four basic freedoms, namely, goods, capital, people, and services. Euro and the Schengen Agreement are the two pillars supporting the EU. However, the European debt crisis, Syrian refugees, and terrorist attacks have affected the stability of the two pillars. Various factors cause British people to believe that it is unworthy of continuing European integration because the United Kingdom benefits from the EU at a cost of losing more.
This study investigates the history of coopetition between the United Kingdom and the EU and uses interdependence theory to analyse the economic consideration of the United Kingdom to join the EU, the context of the Brexit vote, and the viewpoints of advocates and opposition for remaining in the EU. We also analyse different dimensions, including trade, job opportunity, the EU membership fee, European debt crisis, immigrants, and border control, as well as the effect of Breixt on both the UK itself and the EU. In addition, because of the centralization trend of the EU, the United Kingdom claims to retrieve the losing autonomy of legal regulation, fiscal governance, and immigration control.
After the decision of leaving the EU was determined, the UK Prime Minister Theresa Mary May proposed a Brexit White Paper in 2017, declaring that the United Kingdom will leave the EU completely. Long and complicated negotiations between the United Kingdom and the EU are expected. From the Brexit issue to Trump elected as the US president, these events reveal a trend of antiglobalisation, ethnic nationalism, and refusal to yield sovereignty to supranational organisations such as the EU. This trend is changing the politics in the Europe and the United States; thus, the present study is conducted to preliminarily identify the rationale behind this trend.
|
author2 |
郭武平 |
author_facet |
郭武平 黎蕙綾 |
author |
黎蕙綾 |
spellingShingle |
黎蕙綾 The Brexit referendum and European integration |
author_sort |
黎蕙綾 |
title |
The Brexit referendum and European integration |
title_short |
The Brexit referendum and European integration |
title_full |
The Brexit referendum and European integration |
title_fullStr |
The Brexit referendum and European integration |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Brexit referendum and European integration |
title_sort |
brexit referendum and european integration |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9d6fx2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT líhuìlíng thebrexitreferendumandeuropeanintegration AT líhuìlíng yīngguótuōōugōngtóuyǔōuzhōutǒnghé AT líhuìlíng brexitreferendumandeuropeanintegration |
_version_ |
1718706848768458752 |