Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond

碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 應用經濟學系所 === 105 === This study explored the association among the U.S. federal funds rate (FFR), the S&P 500 Index, and the U.S. high-yield bond (HYB) index by applying a vector autoregressive model to test Granger causality. We used data across 29 years between October 1, 1986...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meng-Wen Tsai, 蔡盟文
Other Authors: 張嘉玲
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/38363750191295023888
id ndltd-TW-105NCHU5412032
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105NCHU54120322017-11-12T04:39:01Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/38363750191295023888 Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond 美國聯邦基金利率、S&P500指數與美國高收益債指數的聯動分析 Meng-Wen Tsai 蔡盟文 碩士 國立中興大學 應用經濟學系所 105 This study explored the association among the U.S. federal funds rate (FFR), the S&P 500 Index, and the U.S. high-yield bond (HYB) index by applying a vector autoregressive model to test Granger causality. We used data across 29 years between October 1, 1986 and December 31, 2015 to compare the results of monthly and weekly average data. Empirical results of the monthly data showed that the previous U.S. FFR spread, S&P 500 Index yields, and the U.S. HYB returns had a positive impact on the current U.S. FFR spread, S&P 500 Index yields, and the U.S. HYB returns. Moreover, previous S&P 500 Index yields also had a positive impact on the current U.S. FFR spread and U.S. HYB returns. However, empirical results of the weekly data showed that the previous U.S. FFR spread had a negative impact on the current U.S. FFR spread, previous S&P 500 Index yields had a negative impact on the current S&P 500 Index yields, and previous U.S. HYB returns had a negative impact on the current U.S. FFR spread. These results were inconsistent with the monthly data, which may have been because investors prioritized profit-taking in the short-term and the weekly data, whereas investors demanded higher yields in the monthly data, which requires more effort on the part of investors. The Granger causality test showed that, in the monthly data, S&P 500 yields preceded the U.S. FFR spread and U.S. HYB returns, and U.S. HYB returns preceded the U.S. FFR spread. In the weekly data, U.S. HYB returns preceded the U.S. FFR spread, which is consistent with the findings for the monthly data. However, in the weekly data, the Granger causality of the stock market for the bond market and interest rates was not significant. This may have been because, in the weekly data, stock market investors placed more emphasis on the short-term yield of the market. 張嘉玲 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 41 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 應用經濟學系所 === 105 === This study explored the association among the U.S. federal funds rate (FFR), the S&P 500 Index, and the U.S. high-yield bond (HYB) index by applying a vector autoregressive model to test Granger causality. We used data across 29 years between October 1, 1986 and December 31, 2015 to compare the results of monthly and weekly average data. Empirical results of the monthly data showed that the previous U.S. FFR spread, S&P 500 Index yields, and the U.S. HYB returns had a positive impact on the current U.S. FFR spread, S&P 500 Index yields, and the U.S. HYB returns. Moreover, previous S&P 500 Index yields also had a positive impact on the current U.S. FFR spread and U.S. HYB returns. However, empirical results of the weekly data showed that the previous U.S. FFR spread had a negative impact on the current U.S. FFR spread, previous S&P 500 Index yields had a negative impact on the current S&P 500 Index yields, and previous U.S. HYB returns had a negative impact on the current U.S. FFR spread. These results were inconsistent with the monthly data, which may have been because investors prioritized profit-taking in the short-term and the weekly data, whereas investors demanded higher yields in the monthly data, which requires more effort on the part of investors. The Granger causality test showed that, in the monthly data, S&P 500 yields preceded the U.S. FFR spread and U.S. HYB returns, and U.S. HYB returns preceded the U.S. FFR spread. In the weekly data, U.S. HYB returns preceded the U.S. FFR spread, which is consistent with the findings for the monthly data. However, in the weekly data, the Granger causality of the stock market for the bond market and interest rates was not significant. This may have been because, in the weekly data, stock market investors placed more emphasis on the short-term yield of the market.
author2 張嘉玲
author_facet 張嘉玲
Meng-Wen Tsai
蔡盟文
author Meng-Wen Tsai
蔡盟文
spellingShingle Meng-Wen Tsai
蔡盟文
Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond
author_sort Meng-Wen Tsai
title Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond
title_short Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond
title_full Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond
title_fullStr Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond
title_full_unstemmed Linkage and Analysis : US Federal Fund Rate, S&P500, and US High Yield Corporate Bond
title_sort linkage and analysis : us federal fund rate, s&p500, and us high yield corporate bond
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/38363750191295023888
work_keys_str_mv AT mengwentsai linkageandanalysisusfederalfundratesp500andushighyieldcorporatebond
AT càiméngwén linkageandanalysisusfederalfundratesp500andushighyieldcorporatebond
AT mengwentsai měiguóliánbāngjījīnlìlǜsp500zhǐshùyǔměiguógāoshōuyìzhàizhǐshùdeliándòngfēnxī
AT càiméngwén měiguóliánbāngjījīnlìlǜsp500zhǐshùyǔměiguógāoshōuyìzhàizhǐshùdeliándòngfēnxī
_version_ 1718561652442398720