Mechanical assembly industry into Toyota management Key success factors

碩士 === 國立勤益科技大學 === 流通管理系 === 105 === This study was conducted on the case study of the magazine assembly plant in the mechanical assembly industry, and the case company introduced the Toyota Production System (TPS) or the timely production mode (Just-In-Time Production, referred to as JIT), t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yao An tsai, 蔡曜安
Other Authors: Hong Ze Lin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/dwyspk
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立勤益科技大學 === 流通管理系 === 105 === This study was conducted on the case study of the magazine assembly plant in the mechanical assembly industry, and the case company introduced the Toyota Production System (TPS) or the timely production mode (Just-In-Time Production, referred to as JIT), to introduce this to reduce the waste of space, waste of time, improve the process, this paper to analyze the key success factors imported Toyota management. At the beginning of the study, 13 key factors were extracted from the relevant literature, extending from the understanding of the characteristics of the Toyota -style management, 1 to reduce the inventory as much as possible to achieve zero inventory realm, 2 timely and automated small batch and The principle of homogenization of production, 3 to retain the value and create value, 4 to continuously improve the process and operations to eliminate ineffective waste, 5 people-oriented focus on complementary team length, 6 to improve the corporate culture is more appropriate and then the actual structure of the two enterprises extended, 7 There are plans to customize the target (short medium and long term), 8 have high-frequency interactive communication to adjust to the goal, 9 flexible organizational structure change responsibility, 10 operators and senior executives to participate and support, 11 enterprises The implementation of the implementation of personnel and personnel training, 12 reasonable KPI system and competition system, 13 all the staff of the awareness of change adhere to. A total of 13 important key factors were used as quantitative questionnaires, 80 questionnaires were distributed, 72 questionnaires were retrieved, and 41 questionnaires were used. This study used the pairwise comparison method in the hierarchy analysis method to analyze the employees' The degree of understanding of the value, to predict the success rate of import and import and education advocacy direction ", for this mechanical assembly plant, Toyota management core concept and advocacy education. Analysis of the results, such as the 13 important key factors in the overall order, "4 continuous improvement process and operation to eliminate invalid waste" (weight 0.11) for the first, followed by "8 high-frequency interactive communication to adjust to the goal" (Weight 0.10), the third is "7 planned target (short medium and long term)" (weight 0.0.8). And then by 13 key key factors to compare each other, one of the intuitive method (13 corporate staff to change the cognitive persistence, 5 people-oriented focus on teamwork complement each other length, 2 timely and automation is the principle of small batch and homogeneous production ) Comparative pairing comparison method (4) Continuous improvement of processes and operations Elimination of ineffective waste V3 Retention of value and creation of value 7 There are planned custom targets (short medium and long term)), and the second is arranged in a group, The third of the group will be compared to the importance of their alignment, and the key after this arrangement of the same range of results are: 1. V4 continuous improvement process and operation to eliminate invalid waste, 2.V5 people-oriented focus on team complement each other, V7 has a planned customization target (short medium and long term). 4.V8 high-frequency interactive communication to adjust to the goal of progress, 5.V2 timely and automated is the principle of small batch and homogenization of production, by the sorting results that the top five key success factors, through this study can be confirmed , For the difference between the nature of the department and the work of the concept of understanding will have different views will have different views and interpretation of the above analysis, for the enterprise management side of the presentation, which can provide analysis of information The results, so that intends to import TPS or has been in the implementation of the implementation of the enterprise to do a reference, before the import of self-examination of the enterprise physical development can be carried out, the research data allows enterprises to measure and find countermeasures, help decision makers Make a rational judgment.