| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立宜蘭大學 === 建築與永續規劃研究所碩士班 === 105 === The purpose of this study is to take the collection of Wu Shi Harbor as an example for
zone expropriation, to discuss the contents of the operation, the mode of operation, to study
the results of its feasible assessment and analysis of the comparative analysis of the financial
results after the development and the benefit of the surrounding development Research results
and recommendations, as a reference to the provision of the relevant government planning
units and other private sector development planning staff, in the collection and development
of the mode of development and reference time. To achieve this purpose, the use of sensitivity
analysis method, SWOT analysis and interviews with case law to analyze inferences.
The results show that the development projects after the financial settlement, financial
income of 3.3 billion and 1,305 million dollars surplus of 1.7 billion 0,821 million dollars,
with the original developers before the financial assessment can only be balanced by Mian
results varies greatly, reason, because changing real estate market boom, by the impact of the
world economic boom, making it possible to develop the land after the construction of all
marked off; the opening of its second land auction results, which marked the highest price
break off residential 90 thousand dollars, commercial the area more than 110 thousand dollars,
residential average premium of 10%. The average premium of 24% of the business district.
The average premium of 19% of precincts tours. The auction is expected to average unit price
per ping when the second land auction revenue, totaling 2.5 billion and 3,193 million dollars,,
far beyond the original financial assessment of 32 thousand dollars, up to 3-4 times. The result
of this super-surplus, the local government finance has great help, but also to other urban
projects have fueled the accelerated development of the effect.
The purpose and benefits of the collection and development of the zone expropriation
are usually diversified. It is suggested that the Government should not consider the financial
balance or the surplus as the main consideration for the development of decision-making.
When the real estate is high, the Government has repeatedly proposed a scheme for the
collection and development of the district. Increase land supply to stabilize land prices. But
because of the development of long time can not produce immediate effects, anti-easily lead
to housing prices stabilized when the supply of excess situation, the formation of land
resources waste, in violation of the policy used to the purpose; even lead to planning within
the scope of speculation in the land. Therefore, when the government collects and develops in
the decision-making section, it should abolish the mentality of land development and
profit-taking, return to the public interest, and take into account the fairness of the
government when it obtains private land and land development.
|
|---|
