Analysis on the Importance of Educational Factors in the Sustainable Development of the Kenting National Park and Neighboring Communities

碩士 === 國立高雄師範大學 === 科學教育暨環境教育研究所 === 105 === The purpose of this study is to explore the different views of educational factors in the sustainable development (environmental education) between the Kenting national park and neighboring communities. There are one hundred and fifty participants joined...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIN,CHIUNG-YAO, 林瓊瑤
Other Authors: HUANG,CHIN-FEI
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/c77ugm
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立高雄師範大學 === 科學教育暨環境教育研究所 === 105 === The purpose of this study is to explore the different views of educational factors in the sustainable development (environmental education) between the Kenting national park and neighboring communities. There are one hundred and fifty participants joined in this study. The participants consists of the national park staff, the residents who live in and outside of the 30 km surrounding area of national park. All of the participants were asked to complete a survey (α = .90) which involve 3 environmental education resource dimensions and 30 items to collect the statistic data. This survey was developed by the authors and also been referred by the Indicator Scale for Coastal and Oceanographic Management (ICOM) and Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Thirty of the participants were asked an open-ended questionnaire which involved 4 items to collect qualitative data. The open-ended questionnaire was developed by the authors. In this study, the results showed that the sequences of importance of the three environmental education resource dimensions are management dimension, ecological dimension and social economic dimension. Besides, there are significantly different views of socio-economic dimension and management dimension between national park staff, residents in the neighborhood and other residents. However, there are no significantly differences between these three groups of participants in the ecological dimension. According to the analysis results above, this study suggested that the relevant community should construct the environmental education field.