Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 地理學系 === 105 === The diversified discourses of “environmentalism” and “sustainable development,” as well as the environmental governance controversies have occurred in Taiwan in recent years. Cases like, Miramar Resort Taitung Controversy in 2004~2014, Smangus Beech Event in 2007...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu, You-Wei, 劉有為
Other Authors: Su, Shu-Juan
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/97yw6u
id ndltd-TW-105NTNU5136008
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105NTNU51360082019-05-15T23:17:17Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/97yw6u Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities 參與式環境治理的政治生態學分析-以台灣地質公園示範區為例 Liu, You-Wei 劉有為 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 地理學系 105 The diversified discourses of “environmentalism” and “sustainable development,” as well as the environmental governance controversies have occurred in Taiwan in recent years. Cases like, Miramar Resort Taitung Controversy in 2004~2014, Smangus Beech Event in 2007, and hunting controversy of Puyuma Tribe in 2015, have highlighted significant gaps in environmental awareness and governance methods between “the state” and “the local.” More and more discourses on issues of environmental governance have pointed out the importance of public participation, localization, respect for traditional local knowledge, and joint governance. Starting in 2002, The Council of Agriculture has promoted “Goepark” with projects and plans responding to the latest trends of international landscape conservation and environmental governance. It does, not only emphasize the core values of landscape conservation, environmental education, community participation, and environmental tourism, but also focuses on multi-scale network exchanges and mutual learning. From political ecology perspective, this study conducted in-depth interviews with important local opinion leaders and engaged in participant field survey to investigate communities’ responses to new environmental governance, including motivation of community participation, factors taken into consideration, and how communities and their members engage in the public decision-making of local affairs related to geopark. Moreover, this study also tried to delineated “typology” of geopark community governance, which should become significant for future investigation and understanding of other communitiey environmental governance. Su, Shu-Juan 蘇淑娟 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 131 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 地理學系 === 105 === The diversified discourses of “environmentalism” and “sustainable development,” as well as the environmental governance controversies have occurred in Taiwan in recent years. Cases like, Miramar Resort Taitung Controversy in 2004~2014, Smangus Beech Event in 2007, and hunting controversy of Puyuma Tribe in 2015, have highlighted significant gaps in environmental awareness and governance methods between “the state” and “the local.” More and more discourses on issues of environmental governance have pointed out the importance of public participation, localization, respect for traditional local knowledge, and joint governance. Starting in 2002, The Council of Agriculture has promoted “Goepark” with projects and plans responding to the latest trends of international landscape conservation and environmental governance. It does, not only emphasize the core values of landscape conservation, environmental education, community participation, and environmental tourism, but also focuses on multi-scale network exchanges and mutual learning. From political ecology perspective, this study conducted in-depth interviews with important local opinion leaders and engaged in participant field survey to investigate communities’ responses to new environmental governance, including motivation of community participation, factors taken into consideration, and how communities and their members engage in the public decision-making of local affairs related to geopark. Moreover, this study also tried to delineated “typology” of geopark community governance, which should become significant for future investigation and understanding of other communitiey environmental governance.
author2 Su, Shu-Juan
author_facet Su, Shu-Juan
Liu, You-Wei
劉有為
author Liu, You-Wei
劉有為
spellingShingle Liu, You-Wei
劉有為
Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities
author_sort Liu, You-Wei
title Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities
title_short Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities
title_full Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities
title_fullStr Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities
title_full_unstemmed Political Ecology Analysis of Participatory Environmental Governance - A Case Study of Taiwan Geopark Demonstration Communities
title_sort political ecology analysis of participatory environmental governance - a case study of taiwan geopark demonstration communities
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/97yw6u
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyouwei politicalecologyanalysisofparticipatoryenvironmentalgovernanceacasestudyoftaiwangeoparkdemonstrationcommunities
AT liúyǒuwèi politicalecologyanalysisofparticipatoryenvironmentalgovernanceacasestudyoftaiwangeoparkdemonstrationcommunities
AT liuyouwei cānyǔshìhuánjìngzhìlǐdezhèngzhìshēngtàixuéfēnxīyǐtáiwāndezhìgōngyuánshìfànqūwèilì
AT liúyǒuwèi cānyǔshìhuánjìngzhìlǐdezhèngzhìshēngtàixuéfēnxīyǐtáiwāndezhìgōngyuánshìfànqūwèilì
_version_ 1719144539429535744