| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 健康促進與衛生教育學系 === 105 === The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of health promotion lifestyle who used in civil sports center. To explore the relationship between the social population, self-perceived health status and the status of health promotion lifestyle with each other. And further discussed the status of health promotion predictive factor.
This study object were taken from the users whom used civil sports center by cross-sectional study. Collected data by self-administered questionnaire. Questionnaire were passed through five hundred cases and four hundred seventy-six cases were returned. The return rate is 95.2%. And the efficiency questionnaire return four hundred thirty-four cases, efficiency questionnaire rate was 91.2%. All data and frequency distribution were performed with the SPSS 22.0. Significant results were as followed:
1.Self-perceived health status standard point was 64.73 approaches intermediate; Above eighty-five percent respondents feels their healthy compare with the same age is common status; Seventy-five percent respondents feels their healthy compare with six months ago is common status; Near ninety-five percent respondents feels their Self-perceived health status was better than common status.
2.Health promotion lifestyle standard point was 64.73 approaches intermediate; Six items sequence by points was “Nutrition”, ”Pressure management” ,” Interpersonal support” ,” Self – actualization” , “Exercise” , “Health responsibility”.
3.There were significant difference between the factors such us “gender”,” age”, exercise” habit”, ” exercise hours per week “from self-perceived health status.
4.There were significant difference between the factors such us “marital status”, “exercise habit “,” exercise hours per week “from health promotion lifestyle.
5.The” self-perceived health status” and “health promotion lifestyle” had a significant positive correlation in the relationship. It showed a presentation the higher “self-perceived health status” points made the “health promotion lifestyle” better.
6.Used “gender”, ” exercise hours per week”,” self-perceived health status” this three variables to predict “health promotion lifestyle” could be explain” health promotion lifestyle” population variance was nineteen point eight percent.
|
|---|
