A Study on Policemen Across the Strait Striking Together to Deal with the Crime of Telecom Fraud

• Main Authors: TSENG,YI-CHUN, 曾逸群
• Other Authors: WANG,PO-CHI
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2017
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5wgpks

碩士 === 銘傳大學 === 犯罪防治學系兩岸與犯罪防治碩士在職專班 === 106 === On June 25, 2009, following the entry into force of the "Taiwan Strait Crime Crime and Judicial Mutual Assistance and Mutual Assistance Agreement", cross-Strait police jointly cracked down on cross-border telecommunications fraud. Although Taiwan Telecom Fraud Group has stepped into the world of communications science and technology, The popularization and globalization of the road, continue to learn the latest evolution of technology innovation, fraud is no longer confined to the victim's location, but comprehensively expand to all countries in the world. This study is to analyze and discuss the cross-border police jointly combat the crime of cross-border fraud to understand the impact of cross-strait cooperation in combating cross-border fraud crime factors, according to the study of cross-strait cross-border criminal strategy and cross-Strait police jointly combat cross-border fraud criminal cooperation Direction, provide relevant departments of the practical operation of the reference. This study argues that the cross-strait cross-border cross-border crime patterns, cross-strait criminal investigation system and cross-strait police mutual trust and other factors affect the cross-Strait police to jointly crack down on cross-boundary fraud crime policy formulation. Therefore, based on the four aspects of influencing factors, policies, cooperation mechanisms and achievements and prospects of the cross-Strait police to jointly crack down on cross-border fraud crimes, this study prepared deep-level interview questionnaires and actually participated in cross-Strait crime against cross-border fraud through qualitative interview The total number of cross-Strait police officers is five, in order to gain a deeper understanding of the status quo of the cross-Strait crime against fraud and to verify the hypothesis of this study. However, since May 2016, under the influence of the political environment, the cooperation model of cross-Strait cooperation in cracking down telecommunications fraud has begun to change. Rulon has no longer adhered to the consensus of "returning each of its own people to the people of the other side" since the seizure of suspected telecommunications frauds in the past. Led to Taiwan suspected of being the third case was sent to mainland China frequently interrogated cases, prompting some of the telecommunications fraud to deceive the engine room gradually moved to a democratic country under the rule of law in Europe in search of human rights guarantees. This again shows that the joint cross-Strait crackdown in criminal cooperation is facing a new and grave situation. Through the above empirical studies, the present study proposes that "mutual understanding of cross-Strait police cooperation should crack down on the procedures of cracking down on telecommunications frauds", "the mutual assistance and mutual trust between the police on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should be improved." "There is still room for improvement and improvement in coping mechanisms between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait crime Three other conclusions. Finally, based on the conclusion, we propose to expand police exchanges and the mainland people's attention on the "counter-repayment of stolen money" and "lenient sentence". We hope that this will effectively enhance the effectiveness of cross-Strait police jointly cracking down cross-border telecommunications fraud.