Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 外國語文學系 === 106 === This thesis explores the types of address forms found speech acts of political debates in English and Mandarin Chinese and how politeness is communicated. In this study we focus on forms of address to determine the degree of politeness which is used by both male...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas J.Moran, 黃晨峰
Other Authors: Hui-chi Lee
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ggkpna
id ndltd-TW-106NCKU5094005
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-106NCKU50940052019-05-16T00:30:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ggkpna Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates 政治辯論中之言談行為--以2016年美國和台灣總統之辯論為例 Thomas J.Moran 黃晨峰 碩士 國立成功大學 外國語文學系 106 This thesis explores the types of address forms found speech acts of political debates in English and Mandarin Chinese and how politeness is communicated. In this study we focus on forms of address to determine the degree of politeness which is used by both male and female candidates when opposing one another in political debate. Lee (2011) defines address forms as “a marker, by tradition or law, which precedes a reference to a person who holds a title or post, or to the office itself.” This definition extends to any use of language to address members in these debates, including pronouns and proper nouns. Following the collection and descriptive analysis of this data, the politeness of these speech acts is discussed. The analysis of the discourse of these political debates between male and female candidates utilizes Searle’s Speech Act Theory (1969), Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory (1987), and Grice’s Cooperative Principles (1970). Additionally, the cooperative nature of the debates in the context of gender linguistics (Lakoff, 1973, 2003) is discussed. Within the variety of speech acts, this analysis is only concerned with commissive speech acts. Commissive speech acts are found to be more common in political debate (Al-Bantany, 2014). These types of speech acts are defined as the acts speakers use to commit themselves to some future action and include promises, threats, refusals, guarantees, volunteering, and offering. These speech acts used in combination with address forms are clear indicators of a candidate’s politeness in this type of discourse. The data is compiled directly from the transcripts of the debates. The findings show the differences in male and female speech in political debate especially with regard to politeness. This thesis provides for a gap in the research regarding politeness in political debates between male and female candidates in English and in Mandarin Chinese. Hui-chi Lee 李惠琦 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 142 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 外國語文學系 === 106 === This thesis explores the types of address forms found speech acts of political debates in English and Mandarin Chinese and how politeness is communicated. In this study we focus on forms of address to determine the degree of politeness which is used by both male and female candidates when opposing one another in political debate. Lee (2011) defines address forms as “a marker, by tradition or law, which precedes a reference to a person who holds a title or post, or to the office itself.” This definition extends to any use of language to address members in these debates, including pronouns and proper nouns. Following the collection and descriptive analysis of this data, the politeness of these speech acts is discussed. The analysis of the discourse of these political debates between male and female candidates utilizes Searle’s Speech Act Theory (1969), Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory (1987), and Grice’s Cooperative Principles (1970). Additionally, the cooperative nature of the debates in the context of gender linguistics (Lakoff, 1973, 2003) is discussed. Within the variety of speech acts, this analysis is only concerned with commissive speech acts. Commissive speech acts are found to be more common in political debate (Al-Bantany, 2014). These types of speech acts are defined as the acts speakers use to commit themselves to some future action and include promises, threats, refusals, guarantees, volunteering, and offering. These speech acts used in combination with address forms are clear indicators of a candidate’s politeness in this type of discourse. The data is compiled directly from the transcripts of the debates. The findings show the differences in male and female speech in political debate especially with regard to politeness. This thesis provides for a gap in the research regarding politeness in political debates between male and female candidates in English and in Mandarin Chinese.
author2 Hui-chi Lee
author_facet Hui-chi Lee
Thomas J.Moran
黃晨峰
author Thomas J.Moran
黃晨峰
spellingShingle Thomas J.Moran
黃晨峰
Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates
author_sort Thomas J.Moran
title Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates
title_short Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates
title_full Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates
title_fullStr Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates
title_full_unstemmed Speech acts in Political Debates: An Analysis of the 2016 American and Taiwanese Presidential Debates
title_sort speech acts in political debates: an analysis of the 2016 american and taiwanese presidential debates
publishDate 2018
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ggkpna
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasjmoran speechactsinpoliticaldebatesananalysisofthe2016americanandtaiwanesepresidentialdebates
AT huángchénfēng speechactsinpoliticaldebatesananalysisofthe2016americanandtaiwanesepresidentialdebates
AT thomasjmoran zhèngzhìbiànlùnzhōngzhīyántánxíngwèiyǐ2016niánměiguóhétáiwānzǒngtǒngzhībiànlùnwèilì
AT huángchénfēng zhèngzhìbiànlùnzhōngzhīyántánxíngwèiyǐ2016niánměiguóhétáiwānzǒngtǒngzhībiànlùnwèilì
_version_ 1719166441175908352