Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8
碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 大氣科學學系 === 106 === In this study, we aim to understand the effects of different microphysics (MP)schemes [including single- (SM) and double-moment (DM)] on the ensemble spread under the framework of ensemble forecasts in the cloud-resolving model. We first analyze the basic feature...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2018
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5t2a3n |
id |
ndltd-TW-106NCU05021011 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-106NCU050210112019-09-12T03:37:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5t2a3n Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 不同微物理方案在雲可解析模式的系集預報分析: SoWMEX-IOP8 個案 Chin-Hung Chen 陳勁宏 碩士 國立中央大學 大氣科學學系 106 In this study, we aim to understand the effects of different microphysics (MP)schemes [including single- (SM) and double-moment (DM)] on the ensemble spread under the framework of ensemble forecasts in the cloud-resolving model. We first analyze the basic features of these schemes through the deterministic forecasts then using the ensemble method to focus on the comparison of the ensemble-based error structures and investigate the sensitivity of the initial conditions to different MP schemes. The simulation for the heavy rainfall event during the Southwest Monsoon Experiment on June 16, 2008 (SoWMEX-IOP8) is examined with the WRF model. In all ensemble experiments, the initial conditions are obtained from the regional data assimilation system (WRF-LETKF). Four different MP schemes were selected for analysis, including GCE, MOR, WSM6, and WDM6 schemes. Results show that the DM schemes (MOR, WDM6) do not necessarily produce a larger ensemble spread than the SM schemes (GCE, WSM6). Different MP schemes have great differences in the distribution of hydrometeors, especially with the icerelated variables. Results show that GCE has a relatively large spread in almost every variable. This is mainly because GCE has a relatively strong and variable vertical velocity associated with the efficient phase transition results in the spread of latent heat release increases and further affect the spread of larger-scale temperature and wind fields. The benefits of the DM scheme are only apparent when comparing similar MP schemes (WSM6, WDM6). Especially in the rainwater and cloud water, even if the two methods use similar ice processes, it seems that the spread caused by the DM treatment in the warm rain processes will further affect the spread of ice-related variables. Therefore, if the ensemble is established by the multi-MP method, the results of this study show that the combination of GCE and WDM6 schemes would be more effective in increasing the overall ensemble spread to represent the forecast error in different aspects. Finally, we found that the ice-related processes are handled very differently with different MP scheme developers and these difference will affect the pattern of latent heat release which in turn affect larger-scale temperature and wind fields. Kao-Shen Chung Shu-Chih Yang 鍾高陞 楊舒芝 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 99 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 大氣科學學系 === 106 === In this study, we aim to understand the effects of different microphysics (MP)schemes [including single- (SM) and double-moment (DM)] on the ensemble spread under the framework of ensemble forecasts in the cloud-resolving model. We first analyze the basic features of these schemes through the deterministic forecasts then using the ensemble method to focus on the comparison of the ensemble-based error structures and investigate the sensitivity of the initial conditions to different MP schemes. The simulation for the heavy rainfall event during the Southwest Monsoon Experiment on June 16, 2008 (SoWMEX-IOP8) is examined with the WRF model. In all ensemble experiments, the initial conditions are obtained from the regional data assimilation system (WRF-LETKF). Four different MP schemes were selected for analysis, including GCE, MOR, WSM6, and WDM6 schemes.
Results show that the DM schemes (MOR, WDM6) do not necessarily produce a larger ensemble spread than the SM schemes (GCE, WSM6). Different MP schemes have great differences in the distribution of hydrometeors, especially with the icerelated variables. Results show that GCE has a relatively large spread in almost every variable. This is mainly because GCE has a relatively strong and variable vertical velocity associated with the efficient phase transition results in the spread of latent heat release increases and further affect the spread of larger-scale temperature and wind fields. The benefits of the DM scheme are only apparent when comparing similar MP schemes (WSM6, WDM6). Especially in the rainwater and cloud water, even if the two methods use similar ice processes, it seems that the spread caused by the DM treatment in the warm rain processes will further affect the spread of ice-related variables.
Therefore, if the ensemble is established by the multi-MP method, the results of this study show that the combination of GCE and WDM6 schemes would be more effective in increasing the overall ensemble spread to represent the forecast error in different aspects. Finally, we found that the ice-related processes are handled very differently with different MP scheme developers and these difference will affect the pattern of latent heat release which in turn affect larger-scale temperature and wind fields.
|
author2 |
Kao-Shen Chung |
author_facet |
Kao-Shen Chung Chin-Hung Chen 陳勁宏 |
author |
Chin-Hung Chen 陳勁宏 |
spellingShingle |
Chin-Hung Chen 陳勁宏 Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 |
author_sort |
Chin-Hung Chen |
title |
Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 |
title_short |
Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 |
title_full |
Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Using Different Microphysics Schemes for the Cloud-Resolving Ensemble forecasts during SoWMEX-IOP8 |
title_sort |
analysis of using different microphysics schemes for the cloud-resolving ensemble forecasts during sowmex-iop8 |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5t2a3n |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chinhungchen analysisofusingdifferentmicrophysicsschemesforthecloudresolvingensembleforecastsduringsowmexiop8 AT chénjìnhóng analysisofusingdifferentmicrophysicsschemesforthecloudresolvingensembleforecastsduringsowmexiop8 AT chinhungchen bùtóngwēiwùlǐfāngànzàiyúnkějiěxīmóshìdexìjíyùbàofēnxīsowmexiop8gèàn AT chénjìnhóng bùtóngwēiwùlǐfāngànzàiyúnkějiěxīmóshìdexìjíyùbàofēnxīsowmexiop8gèàn |
_version_ |
1719249542298206208 |