A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China
碩士 === 國防大學 === 戰略研究所 === 106 === In 2016, the "dual-track" police appointment system in Taiwan has caused fairness disputes, which caused the Control Yuan to initiate ainvestigation. The results of that investigation suggested the police department to initiate a system reform with more pr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2018
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/xrtb4d |
id |
ndltd-TW-106NDU00322022 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-106NDU003220222019-05-16T00:15:36Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/xrtb4d A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China 兩岸警察人員任用制度比較研究 PIEN,TUN-JEN 邊邨人 碩士 國防大學 戰略研究所 106 In 2016, the "dual-track" police appointment system in Taiwan has caused fairness disputes, which caused the Control Yuan to initiate ainvestigation. The results of that investigation suggested the police department to initiate a system reform with more professionalism and fairness for adjusting the police officers' examinations so as to nurture the police force. In the light of similar cultural on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, this article used institutional research approaches, followed with classification, literature analysis, and comparative research methods to classify the police officer’s appointment system models of different countries, and then use that to compare the appointment system of Taiwan and Mainland China in order to provide some useful recommendations. This study found the training-oriented “Examination-Training-Appointment” system has become the mainstream to Western and North-East Asia countries, such as Britain, German, the United States, Japan, South Korea, etc. Moreover, Germany has developed a new strategy of combining higher police education with diplomas. Taiwan and Mainland China both have a well-developed police education system. In order to response the changing social environment, both sides have adopted the "dual-track" police appointment system of “Education -Examination-Appointment” and “Examination-Training-Appointment”, the first one has been mainly used by both sides. However, there are still some differences between Taiwan and Mainland China in terms of police education, examination, training, and appointment. After a lengthy discussion, this article argues that the "Examination-Education-Appointment" system, which combines the traditional police education and civil service examination system could be the best model for Taiwan’s police officer’s appointment system and the educational training model emphasizing actual combat abilities which has been adopted by Western and North-East Asia countries is also worth to take a deep look. YU,RUEI-LIN 郁瑞麟 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 244 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國防大學 === 戰略研究所 === 106 === In 2016, the "dual-track" police appointment system in Taiwan has caused fairness disputes, which caused the Control Yuan to initiate ainvestigation. The results of that investigation suggested the police department to initiate a system reform with more professionalism and fairness for adjusting the police officers' examinations so as to nurture the police force.
In the light of similar cultural on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, this article used institutional research approaches, followed with classification, literature analysis, and comparative research methods to classify the police officer’s appointment system models of different countries, and then use that to compare the appointment system of Taiwan and Mainland China in order to provide some useful recommendations.
This study found the training-oriented “Examination-Training-Appointment” system has become the mainstream to Western and North-East Asia countries, such as Britain, German, the United States, Japan, South Korea, etc. Moreover, Germany has developed a new strategy of combining higher police education with diplomas. Taiwan and Mainland China both have a well-developed police education system. In order to response the changing social environment, both sides have adopted the "dual-track" police appointment system of “Education -Examination-Appointment” and “Examination-Training-Appointment”, the first one has been mainly used by both sides. However, there are still some differences between Taiwan and Mainland China in terms of police education, examination, training, and appointment. After a lengthy discussion, this article argues that the "Examination-Education-Appointment" system, which combines the traditional police education and civil service examination system could be the best model for Taiwan’s police officer’s appointment system and the educational training model emphasizing actual combat abilities which has been adopted by Western and North-East Asia countries is also worth to take a deep look.
|
author2 |
YU,RUEI-LIN |
author_facet |
YU,RUEI-LIN PIEN,TUN-JEN 邊邨人 |
author |
PIEN,TUN-JEN 邊邨人 |
spellingShingle |
PIEN,TUN-JEN 邊邨人 A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China |
author_sort |
PIEN,TUN-JEN |
title |
A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China |
title_short |
A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China |
title_full |
A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China |
title_fullStr |
A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Study on the Appointment System of Police Officers in Taiwan and Mainland China |
title_sort |
comparative study on the appointment system of police officers in taiwan and mainland china |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/xrtb4d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pientunjen acomparativestudyontheappointmentsystemofpoliceofficersintaiwanandmainlandchina AT biāncūnrén acomparativestudyontheappointmentsystemofpoliceofficersintaiwanandmainlandchina AT pientunjen liǎngànjǐngchárényuánrènyòngzhìdùbǐjiàoyánjiū AT biāncūnrén liǎngànjǐngchárényuánrènyòngzhìdùbǐjiàoyánjiū AT pientunjen comparativestudyontheappointmentsystemofpoliceofficersintaiwanandmainlandchina AT biāncūnrén comparativestudyontheappointmentsystemofpoliceofficersintaiwanandmainlandchina |
_version_ |
1719163816474836992 |