| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 教育心理與輔導學系 === 106 === The current study was to explore nondisclosure of trainee counselors in group co-leadership, trying to investigate the details and the consideration behind it that were not expressed during the interaction process of co-leadership. This study utilized purposive sampling to invite six trainee counselors who were co-leading a nine-times, 45-minutes per period juvenile emotion regulation group to participate in a 50-minutes semi-structured interview before they divided into groups, and after the 2nd, 5th, 9th group while the trainee counselors were taking group counseling course.
The result of the interview was analyzed based on grounded theory, which indicated that there were 4 types in the nondisclosure topic: "expectation and needs of co-leader relationships", "observation and judgment toward others", "care about and doubt with others estimate", "negative emotion". The most common types are "observation and judgment toward others", "expectation and needs of co-leader relationships" and "negative emotion". The phenomenon of nondisclosure radically decreased. The consideration of nondisclosure included "lower confidence and competency concerns", "in order to prevent oneself from having uncomfortable emotion", "being unable and reluctant to express meaningless information", "in order to prevent the relationship from provoking misunderstanding or worsening", "negative perception of the relationship". The prominent consideration is "in order to prevent the relationship from provoking misunderstanding or worsening" and "lower confidence and competency concerns".
The research discovered that there were 2 main character of the nondisclosure experience: (a) to be inclined to evaluate relationship while trying to make comment about others; that is, to consider if others are able to accept the comments; (b) to be inclined to assess individual ability while trying to express his/her need and verify others' comment about oneself; that is, to contemplate if he/she is confident with the point of view that was meant to clarify. Moreover, the research indicated that: (a) the phenomenon of nondisclosure would still exist, no matter how the quality of the relationship is; (b) there are evident connection between the degree of feeling safe, supported and trusted in the relationship and the fact that there is phenomenon of nondisclosure between the co-leaders. Last but not the least, the research would discuss the nondisclosure experience of the co-leaders during different times of interview and different groups that are mentioned above, and it would bring up the limitations of the study that are provided in light of current findings, as well as the suggestion of the future research and practical advice.
|
|---|
