| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 健康促進與衛生教育學系 === 106 === The purpose of the study was to assess the health promotion quality among different worksites characteristic from employers and promoters’point of view, and to examine the health promotion quality consistency between employers and promoters.
The research population based on”the employers and promoters of Workplace which have the certification of health promotion”, the questionnaires that assigh large size workplace and small size workplace by using the stratified random sampling.
Exploring more about the other important factors of health promotion through by focus group interview from purposively sampling.We used SPSS 22.0 to test the reliability and validity of questionnaires, and to conduct descriptive and inferential statistics(including t test, one way ANOVA with scheffe Post Hoc Test, and linear regression model analysis.)
The results of this study are summarized as following:
1. Among The employers and promoters of quality in health promotion, the highest score of average was "human organization", while the lowest score of average was "results of the evaluation."
2. In large size workplace significantly higher than small workplace of "policy", "planning", "social responsibility", " implementation"significant differences; certification group significantly higher than non-certified group of "policy", "human resources "" planning "," implementation ".
3. In the points of employers, regardless of the size of the workplace, certification group significantly higher than non-certified group of "policy", "human resources", "implementation"; in the points of promoters, regardless of the size of the workplace, between certified groups certified and non-certified group are non significant differences.
4. In certification group, employer’s indicators scores were significantly higher than promoter; in non-certified group, the "social responsibility" significant differences between the employer and promoter.
5. The interview of employer, there was totally diffrerent opinions and experience between the certified group and the non-certified group, they also have some inconsistent view on promotion for the further; compared to the promoter, the respondent indicated they face the barrier and hardness on promotion and implement, including it’s difficult to obtain the resourses, but they still try to implement health promotion plan with the available resourse.
6. The workplace of large size should playing a partnership leader, and the employer and promoter must bulid a consensus and strengthen cooperation to advance the Promtoing workplace health promotion certificate continuely.
|
|---|
