The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 表演藝術研究所 === 106 ===   In the summer of 1943, Prokofiev traveled to the town of Perm, in the Ural Mountains, inspired by the French flutist Georges Barrère, he finished the Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94. The Sonata received its premiere performance in Moscow on December 7, 19...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shen, Pei-Hsuan, 沈佩璇
Other Authors: Lee, Yen-I
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/u8snxk
id ndltd-TW-106NTNU5737009
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-106NTNU57370092019-05-16T00:52:38Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/u8snxk The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94 普羅高菲夫《D大調長笛與鋼琴奏鳴曲作品94》之分析與演奏詮釋 Shen, Pei-Hsuan 沈佩璇 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 表演藝術研究所 106   In the summer of 1943, Prokofiev traveled to the town of Perm, in the Ural Mountains, inspired by the French flutist Georges Barrère, he finished the Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94. The Sonata received its premiere performance in Moscow on December 7, 1943 with the flutist Nikolai Kharkovsky and pianist Sviatoslav Richter. Later the Soviet violinist David Oistrakh persuaded Prokofiev to arrange the work for violin and piano. With the help of Oistrakh, the violin version was finally finished and the first performance of the Violin Sonata took place on June 17, 1944, played by Oistrakh and Lev Oborin.   This thesis contains six chapters. The first chapter describes the research motive and purpose of the author, additionally, the method of the research. The second chapter gives an overview of the development of music in the late nineteenth century to mid-twentieth century Russia, the biography of Sergei Prokofiev, introduces his composition style and crucial works, and illustrates the background of the Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94. The third chapter is the analysis of composition, using sheet music of G. Schirmer’s version as the basis for the analysis of this piece. The fourth chapter is the point of view of collaborative piano to discuss Prokofiev’s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94, referring to the above audio data interpretation with graduate students own opinion. The Fifth Chapter is the comparison of several versions, to find out the difference between G. Schirmer and Boosey & Hawkes, and the arrangement of the violin version. Besides, listen to various audio data to enhance the interpretation of this piece. The last chapter is the conclusion. Lee, Yen-I 李燕宜 學位論文 ; thesis 131 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 表演藝術研究所 === 106 ===   In the summer of 1943, Prokofiev traveled to the town of Perm, in the Ural Mountains, inspired by the French flutist Georges Barrère, he finished the Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94. The Sonata received its premiere performance in Moscow on December 7, 1943 with the flutist Nikolai Kharkovsky and pianist Sviatoslav Richter. Later the Soviet violinist David Oistrakh persuaded Prokofiev to arrange the work for violin and piano. With the help of Oistrakh, the violin version was finally finished and the first performance of the Violin Sonata took place on June 17, 1944, played by Oistrakh and Lev Oborin.   This thesis contains six chapters. The first chapter describes the research motive and purpose of the author, additionally, the method of the research. The second chapter gives an overview of the development of music in the late nineteenth century to mid-twentieth century Russia, the biography of Sergei Prokofiev, introduces his composition style and crucial works, and illustrates the background of the Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94. The third chapter is the analysis of composition, using sheet music of G. Schirmer’s version as the basis for the analysis of this piece. The fourth chapter is the point of view of collaborative piano to discuss Prokofiev’s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94, referring to the above audio data interpretation with graduate students own opinion. The Fifth Chapter is the comparison of several versions, to find out the difference between G. Schirmer and Boosey & Hawkes, and the arrangement of the violin version. Besides, listen to various audio data to enhance the interpretation of this piece. The last chapter is the conclusion.
author2 Lee, Yen-I
author_facet Lee, Yen-I
Shen, Pei-Hsuan
沈佩璇
author Shen, Pei-Hsuan
沈佩璇
spellingShingle Shen, Pei-Hsuan
沈佩璇
The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94
author_sort Shen, Pei-Hsuan
title The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94
title_short The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94
title_full The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94
title_fullStr The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94
title_full_unstemmed The Analysis and the Interpretation of Sergei Prokofiev’ s Sonata for Flute and Piano, Op. 94
title_sort analysis and the interpretation of sergei prokofiev’ s sonata for flute and piano, op. 94
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/u8snxk
work_keys_str_mv AT shenpeihsuan theanalysisandtheinterpretationofsergeiprokofievssonataforfluteandpianoop94
AT chénpèixuán theanalysisandtheinterpretationofsergeiprokofievssonataforfluteandpianoop94
AT shenpeihsuan pǔluógāofēifūddàdiàozhǎngdíyǔgāngqínzòumíngqūzuòpǐn94zhīfēnxīyǔyǎnzòuquánshì
AT chénpèixuán pǔluógāofēifūddàdiàozhǎngdíyǔgāngqínzòumíngqūzuòpǐn94zhīfēnxīyǔyǎnzòuquánshì
AT shenpeihsuan analysisandtheinterpretationofsergeiprokofievssonataforfluteandpianoop94
AT chénpèixuán analysisandtheinterpretationofsergeiprokofievssonataforfluteandpianoop94
_version_ 1719171735784259584