A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法律學系一般生組 === 106 === The Perpetuation of Evidence under Civil Procedure Law have already legislated related regulations since Civil Procedure Law legislated in 1930, which had strictly restricted the party only where it is likely that evidence may be destroyed or its use in cou...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2018
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47y2t8 |
id |
ndltd-TW-106NTPU0194021 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-106NTPU01940212019-08-10T03:42:14Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47y2t8 A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law 民事訴訟法上證據保全之研究 CHAO, YUNG-HSUAN 趙永瑄 碩士 國立臺北大學 法律學系一般生組 106 The Perpetuation of Evidence under Civil Procedure Law have already legislated related regulations since Civil Procedure Law legislated in 1930, which had strictly restricted the party only where it is likely that evidence may be destroyed or its use in court may be difficult, or with the consent of the opposing party, or the court considers it necessary. However, it has been relaxed the restriction on Perpetuation of Evidence with several alterations of law. The Perpetuation of Evidence had significant amendments in 2000. For the purpose of Economic Principle of Litigation and Concentrated trial, Perpetuation of Evidence allow that where necessary, the party who has legal interests in ascertaining the status quo of a matter or object may move for expert testimony, inspection or perpetuation of documentary evidence. Nevertheless, Perpetuation of Evidence still generate much controversy until now. This study analyzes Taiwanese Civil Procedure Law’s regulations by referring to related adjudications after amending from 2000 to 2016, searches for the context of the legislator, summarizes scholars’ writing, and organizes related adjudications for proving the problems of the theories. Besides, this study introduces the practices and theories under Japanese Civil Procedure Law by means of viewpoints from the study of comparative law to examine Taiwanese Civil Procedure Law. WU, CHUNG-JOU 吳從周 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 203 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法律學系一般生組 === 106 === The Perpetuation of Evidence under Civil Procedure Law have already legislated related regulations since Civil Procedure Law legislated in 1930, which had strictly restricted the party only where it is likely that evidence may be destroyed or its use in court may be difficult, or with the consent of the opposing party, or the court considers it necessary. However, it has been relaxed the restriction on Perpetuation of Evidence with several alterations of law. The Perpetuation of Evidence had significant amendments in 2000.
For the purpose of Economic Principle of Litigation and Concentrated trial, Perpetuation of Evidence allow that where necessary, the party who has legal interests in ascertaining the status quo of a matter or object may move for expert testimony, inspection or perpetuation of documentary evidence. Nevertheless, Perpetuation of Evidence still generate much controversy until now.
This study analyzes Taiwanese Civil Procedure Law’s regulations by referring to related adjudications after amending from 2000 to 2016, searches for the context of the legislator, summarizes scholars’ writing, and organizes related adjudications for proving the problems of the theories. Besides, this study introduces the practices and theories under Japanese Civil Procedure Law by means of viewpoints from the study of comparative law to examine Taiwanese Civil Procedure Law.
|
author2 |
WU, CHUNG-JOU |
author_facet |
WU, CHUNG-JOU CHAO, YUNG-HSUAN 趙永瑄 |
author |
CHAO, YUNG-HSUAN 趙永瑄 |
spellingShingle |
CHAO, YUNG-HSUAN 趙永瑄 A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law |
author_sort |
CHAO, YUNG-HSUAN |
title |
A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law |
title_short |
A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law |
title_full |
A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law |
title_fullStr |
A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study on Perpetuation of Evidence in Civil Procedure Law |
title_sort |
study on perpetuation of evidence in civil procedure law |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47y2t8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chaoyunghsuan astudyonperpetuationofevidenceincivilprocedurelaw AT zhàoyǒngxuān astudyonperpetuationofevidenceincivilprocedurelaw AT chaoyunghsuan mínshìsùsòngfǎshàngzhèngjùbǎoquánzhīyánjiū AT zhàoyǒngxuān mínshìsùsòngfǎshàngzhèngjùbǎoquánzhīyánjiū AT chaoyunghsuan studyonperpetuationofevidenceincivilprocedurelaw AT zhàoyǒngxuān studyonperpetuationofevidenceincivilprocedurelaw |
_version_ |
1719233674803675136 |