| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 都市計劃研究所 === 106 === The literature on the urban re-development of the neoliberalism has focused on the city-scales between the local government and the private sector. When the neo-liberalist urban strategies governance has practice the developmental state of East Asia, the capital which is the interface city is still strategically intervened by the state apparatus. Therefore many of the literature pay attention to the governance in the power of the central government, local government, and private sector. However, it is still ignore the impact of other scales governance which links from cross-border scales, regional scales, and citizens who are gradually emerging from the policy power stage. Therefore, this study is based on the multi-scale governance analysis structure of urban re-development. By combining the governance relationship between different scales, this study explain the problem of governance contradictory which is complex but more complete and real in the process of urban re-development policy.
This study is a case study “New East District” in Taipei Nangang. Post-industrializing Nangang which had a large amount of Brownfield has become urban development strategy area of Taipei where is limited hinterland in the past 30 years. However, it's urban re-development policy has continued to delay and change. The main reason is the multi-scale governance contradiction under the neo-liberalist urban strategies. Therefore, this study analyzes the reasons for the delay and change of the urban re-development policy in Nangang. The results is that, first, cross-border/ state/ region scales governance contradiction makes the city-region competitiveness is limited. Under the influence of the structure, it reduced the private sector into the development of Nangang, and so far, “Taiwan Brain Power Base - Five Center Plan” without any private sector investment completed. Second, the public private partnership failure crisis of the policy implementation phase. The weak foundation of the public private partnership has led to speculations of public and private sectors. Thus, it affect the effectiveness of urban re-development policy. Third, the policy effect formed the "stagnation" of the public private partnership. The citizens was dissatisfied with the weak foundation of the public private partnership and the polarization development of the neoliberalism, thus formed political pressure to force Taipei city government to adjust the policy. However, after the end of 2014, the mayor's team of KE,WEN-ZHE took too drastic policy adjustments, resulting in the public sector trust and social capital is depreciating, making the private sector do not want to partner with public sector , and then form a new wave of policy delays and changes.
|
|---|
