| Summary: | 碩士 === 臺北市立大學 === 競技運動訓練研究所碩士在職專班 === 106 === Purpose: to compare the body joint angles at different periods and different places when the players opened the tee shot with drivers. Method: Six male college golfers were recruited to swing and stroke in driving range and indoor golf simulator with their own drivers. The performance of swinging was recorded by the digital cameras and was analyzed kinematic variables at different phases of swinging by Silicon Coach Pro. Results: 1) The back angle and the upper trunk side bending angle were no significant difference between the address phase, top of backswing phase, and ball impact phase (p >.05) in driving ranges and indoor golf simulator. 2) At the ball impact phase, the pelvis side banding angle and anterior-posterior tilting angle were greater in driving range than in indoor golf simulator (p < .05). Conclusion: There was no difference in the changes of upper trunk side bending angle from address to top of the backswing phase between driving range and golf simulators, but the pelvis side banding angle and anterior-posterior tilting angle at the stoking phase were greater in driving range than in the simulator. Therefore, indoor swinging has a greater impact on trunk rotation than horizontal offset of upper trunk.
|
|---|
