Technical Analysis of LPGA Tour and CLPGA in 2016

碩士 === 臺北市立大學 === 競技運動訓練研究所 === 106 === Abstract Purpose: This study mainly explores the performance of competitions between Chinese women's professional golf tournament players and the US women's professional golf tournament in 2016, and analyzes the differences in technology with Taiwan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang,Hsien-wen, 黃賢雯
Other Authors: Wang,Hung-Tsung
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/3272tv
Description
Summary:碩士 === 臺北市立大學 === 競技運動訓練研究所 === 106 === Abstract Purpose: This study mainly explores the performance of competitions between Chinese women's professional golf tournament players and the US women's professional golf tournament in 2016, and analyzes the differences in technology with Taiwan's players and coaching staff to provide a useful reference and decision-making. Trigger more golf related research. Methods: The statistics of the matches between the two groups of China Women's tour and the US Ladies tour were obtained. The results of multiple regression and t-test were used to explore the top 30 players of the 2016 US Women's Professional Tour and China Women's Professional Tournaments. Technical differences.Results: The study concluded that due to differences between the China Women's Tour players and the U.S. Ladies Tour players, the difference between the average of Driver distance and the par on the green ratio is mainly due to the difference in overall performance. Conclusion: The main difference between the China Women's tour and the U.S. Ladies Tour is that the average distance kicked off by the China Women's Tour player is shorter than that of the U.S. Ladies tour player. Therefore, if the Chinese women's tour player want to reduce the overall average, It is necessary to increase the average tee-off Driver distance before raising the green rate on the par. Keywords: Driver distance, score average, t test